PELLET B Test Reading Comprehension Analysis Questions and Answers

Question 1

Read the following passage from a department policy manual:

"Department General Order 4.15 states: 'All property seized during an investigation must be logged on Form 34-B before the end of the collecting officer's shift. The form requires the officer's name, the date and time of collection, a specific description of the item, and the location where it was found. Any currency over $500 must be verified by a supervising officer before being sealed in an evidence bag.'"

Officer Miller seizes a laptop and $650 in cash from a suspect at 3:00 PM. His shift ends at 5:00 PM. He immediately has his sergeant verify the cash amount. According to General Order 4.15, what is the next step Officer Miller is required to take?

Accepted Answer

Log the laptop and the cash on Form 34-B.

Answer

Photograph the evidence before logging it.

Answer

Seal the cash and the laptop in separate evidence bags.

Answer

Wait for the next shift to process the evidence.

Question 2

Read the following excerpt from a preliminary investigative report:

"A single window on the ground floor of the residence was broken, with glass fragments found on the interior floor, suggesting force from the outside. Muddy footprints consistent with a work boot were found inside leading from the broken window to a jewelry box in the master bedroom. The jewelry box was open and empty. No other points of entry showed signs of force, and no other areas of the house appeared disturbed."

Based only on the information provided, which of the following is the most logical conclusion?

Accepted Answer

The point of entry was the ground-floor window.

Answer

The perpetrator was familiar with the layout of the house.

Answer

Multiple suspects were involved in the incident.

Answer

The resident staged the burglary for insurance purposes.

Question 3

Read the following witness statement:

"I was walking my dog around 10 PM when I heard a loud argument from the blue house on the corner. I couldn't make out the words, but the voices were angry. A few minutes later, a dark-colored sedan with a broken taillight sped away from the house, heading north on Oak Street. I didn't see who was driving, but it seemed to leave in a hurry. Then everything went quiet."

What is the main idea of this witness statement?

Accepted Answer

To establish a timeline of events and identify a potential vehicle involved.

Answer

To describe the specific content of the argument the witness heard.

Answer

To report a traffic violation involving a speeding sedan.

Answer

To provide a detailed physical description of the people arguing.

Question 4

Read the officer's observation in a report:

"The subject initially provided a false name and date of birth. When confronted with the official identification found in his wallet, he became agitated, refused to answer further questions, and repeatedly requested a lawyer."

From this passage, it can be most reasonably inferred that the subject:

Accepted Answer

was attempting to obstruct the investigation.

Answer

was not involved in the crime being investigated.

Answer

did not understand his right to remain silent.

Answer

had a pre-existing medical condition causing the agitation.

Question 5

Review the following sentences from a draft incident report:

(1) Upon arrival, I observed the victim, Ms. Evans, sitting on her front porch. (2) She was visibly upset and had a contusion on her left cheek. (3) Ms. Evans has lived in the neighborhood for over twenty years and is well-liked by her neighbors. (4) She stated that her ex-husband had forced his way into her home and struck her before stealing her purse.

Which sentence is LEAST relevant for an objective report detailing the facts of an alleged assault and robbery?

Accepted Answer

Sentence 3

Answer

Sentence 1

Answer

Sentence 2

Answer

Sentence 4

Question 6

Read this excerpt from an internal affairs memorandum:

"While Officer Smith's use of a non-standard takedown maneuver was not explicitly prohibited by current policy, it represented a significant deviation from established training protocols. The technique employed increased the risk of injury to the suspect without a clear corresponding benefit to officer safety or situational control. A review of departmental training standards is therefore recommended."

The tone of this passage can best be described as:

Accepted Answer

Analytical and critical

Answer

Accusatory and punitive

Answer

Dismissive and unimportant

Answer

Praising and supportive