PCI Ethical & Professional Standards 2 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: An investigator discovers that a colleague is falsifying interview notes to support a predetermined conclusion. What is the most appropriate action?
- Ignore it to maintain team cohesion
- Report the misconduct through proper channels (Correct answer)
- Confront the colleague publicly
- Destroy the falsified notes yourself
Correct answer: Report the misconduct through proper channels
Reporting misconduct through proper channels upholds professional integrity and the investigator's ethical obligation to accurate reporting.
Question 2: Which principle best describes an investigator's obligation to present findings objectively, regardless of which party hired them?
- Advocacy
- Impartiality (Correct answer)
- Confidentiality
- Loyalty
Correct answer: Impartiality
Impartiality requires investigators to present factual findings without bias toward the hiring party's desired outcome.
Question 3: A PCI is asked by a client to conduct surveillance on a subject in a state where that type of surveillance requires a license the investigator does not hold. What should the investigator do?
- Proceed since the client's need is urgent
- Decline and advise the client to hire a licensed investigator in that state (Correct answer)
- Subcontract secretly to an unlicensed associate
- Complete the task and apply for the license retroactively
Correct answer: Decline and advise the client to hire a licensed investigator in that state
Operating without required licensure violates law and professional standards; the investigator must decline and refer the client appropriately.
Question 4: Which of the following best defines 'conflict of interest' in the context of professional investigations?
- Disagreement between two investigators on methodology
- A situation where personal interests may compromise investigative objectivity (Correct answer)
- A legal dispute between the investigator and a client
- Competing assignments from different clients
Correct answer: A situation where personal interests may compromise investigative objectivity
A conflict of interest arises when personal, financial, or relational interests could impair an investigator's objectivity or loyalty.
Question 5: An investigator is subpoenaed to testify about a client's case. The client instructs the investigator not to disclose certain findings. What should the investigator do?
- Comply with the client's instructions to protect confidentiality
- Refuse to testify
- Consult legal counsel and comply with the subpoena (Correct answer)
- Destroy the relevant documents before testifying
Correct answer: Consult legal counsel and comply with the subpoena
A legal subpoena overrides client confidentiality instructions; the investigator must consult counsel and comply with lawful court orders.
Question 6: Under ASIS International's Code of Ethics, which obligation does a PCI have regarding professional competence?
- Maintain competence only in their primary specialty
- Continually update knowledge and skills relevant to the profession (Correct answer)
- Delegate complex tasks to avoid exceeding competence
- Competence is self-assessed and no ongoing obligation exists
Correct answer: Continually update knowledge and skills relevant to the profession
ASIS ethics require investigators to continuously develop and maintain professional competence throughout their careers.
Question 7: When an investigator learns during an assignment that a subject plans to commit fraud against a third party not related to the current case, the investigator should:
- Ignore it as outside the scope of the engagement
- Immediately alert the subject that they are being watched
- Consider legal and ethical obligations, potentially reporting to appropriate authorities (Correct answer)
- Include the information only if the client pays extra
Correct answer: Consider legal and ethical obligations, potentially reporting to appropriate authorities
Discovering plans for imminent fraud triggers ethical and potentially legal reporting obligations beyond the current client engagement.
An investigator discovers that a colleague is falsifying interview notes to support a predetermined conclusion.
What is the most appropriate action?