An officer observes an individual in a high-crime area at 2:00 AM openly carrying a handgun in a holster. The individual is not engaged in any other suspicious activity. Based on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling in Commonwealth v. Hicks, what level of suspicion does this observation, by itself, provide?
-
A
Probable cause to arrest for a weapons violation.
-
B
Sufficient grounds for a 'Terry' frisk for officer safety.
-
C
Reasonable suspicion to believe criminal activity is afoot.
-
D
None of the above are justified by this observation alone.