On a public street, an elderly woman was mugged and robbed. The victim only saw her assailant's eyes
at the time of the crime. The remainder of his face was hidden by a hooded sweatshirt and a bandana.
While waiting to be interrogated a few days later, the victim noticed the defendant being led through the
courts in jail garb and restrained by handcuffs and leg irons. He was soon identified as the offender by her.
Will the court accept such identification as proof?
-
A
No, because past identification claims are considered hearsay and are never admitted into evidence.
-
B
Yes, if the witness saw the perpetrator's eyes and made the identification based on that, it was trustworthy enough to be admitted.
-
C
Yes, because all that is required is for the witness to recognize someone; the witness' dependability or trustworthiness is subject to cross examination.
-
D
No, because it is insufficiently dependable, and there was far too much speculation to make an exact identification.