Read the following passage:
The peer-review process is a cornerstone of academic publishing, designed to ensure the quality and validity of research before it is disseminated. In this system, a manuscript submitted to a journal is evaluated by a panel of experts in the same field. While this 'gatekeeping' function is crucial for maintaining scholarly standards, critics point out that it can also inadvertently stifle innovation. Groundbreaking research that challenges established paradigms may face resistance from reviewers accustomed to conventional thinking, potentially delaying or even preventing its publication.
-
A
The peer-review system is fundamentally flawed and should be abandoned.
-
B
Only research that confirms existing theories can pass the peer-review process.
-
C
The author believes the process has both significant benefits and potential drawbacks.
-
D
The primary purpose of peer review is to discourage new researchers from entering a field.