A staff member at a licensed premises sells alcohol to a 17-year-old who appears to be much older. The staff member did not ask for identification. If prosecuted, what is the most likely outcome for the staff member?
-
A
The 17-year-old is the only one who has committed an offence by attempting to buy alcohol.
-
B
No offence was committed as the sale was unintentional and the person looked over 18.
-
C
The staff member has likely committed an offence as they failed to exercise 'due diligence'.
-
D
A valid defence exists as long as the premises operates a 'Challenge 25' policy, even if it wasn't used.