โ† All OSSLT Flashcard Decks

- Ontario Secondary School Literacy Writing an Opinion Piece Questions and Answers Flashcards

6 cards from real OSSLT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ€” missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 - Ontario Secondary School Literacy Writing an Opinion Piece Questions and Answers flashcards as text
  1. A student writes an opinion piece about school cafeteria food. Which is the strongest thesis statement?

    Answer: School cafeterias should exclusively offer nutritious meals because student health directly impacts academic performance and long-term well-being.

    This thesis clearly states the opinion and provides two reasons.

  2. A student writes: 'Everyone knows that longer school days are better.' Why is this problematic?

    Answer: It uses a hasty generalization and states opinion as fact

    'Everyone knows' is a hasty generalization that presents opinion as universal truth.

  3. Which best demonstrates addressing a counterargument?

    Answer: Some argue uniforms limit self-expression; however, reduced bullying and increased unity outweigh this concern.

    This acknowledges the opposing view fairly, then refutes it with specific reasons.

  4. A student's opinion piece cites: 'Studies show community gardens reduce neighbourhood crime by up to 15%.' What role does this play?

    Answer: It provides evidence-based support

    Citing studies with specific data provides evidence-based support.

  5. Which concluding sentence is most effective for an opinion piece about second-language education?

    Answer: By embracing second-language education, Ontario can prepare its young people for success in a multilingual world.

    This conclusion restates the argument and provides a compelling final thought.

  6. A student uses the phrase 'Obviously, everyone agrees that screens are destroying our youth.' What TWO problems does this have?

    Answer: Uses false consensus ('everyone agrees') and loaded language ('destroying our youth')

    It assumes false consensus and uses emotionally loaded language instead of measured claims.