Police stop a driver for a broken taillight and, during the stop, a drug dog alerts on the trunk after officers extended the stop 20 minutes waiting for the K-9 unit with no reasonable suspicion of drug activity. Under Rodriguez v. United States, the evidence found in the trunk is:
-
A
Inadmissible, because prolonging a traffic stop beyond its mission without reasonable suspicion violates the Fourth Amendment
-
B
Admissible, because a dog sniff is not a search
-
C
Admissible, because the initial stop was lawful
-
D
Inadmissible, because dog sniffs always require a warrant