Practice Test GeeksOACP - Ontario Association of Chief of Police Practice Test
← All OACP Flashcard Decks

Logical Reasoning and Analysis Flashcards

7 cards from real OACP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Logical Reasoning and Analysis flashcards as text

  1. A commander uses the following reasoning: 'Crime went down after we increased patrols, therefore the patrols caused the decrease.' Which logical error is present?

    Answer: Post hoc ergo propter hoc

    Post hoc ergo propter hoc is the fallacy of assuming causation from temporal sequence alone.

  2. Officers respond to a neighborhood where residents report increased drug activity. Which analytical approach is most appropriate before deploying resources?

    Answer: Cross-reference complaints with existing crime data and field intelligence to validate the trend

    Cross-referencing multiple data sources ensures resource deployment is evidence-based rather than reactive.

  3. The following sequence is presented: 2, 5, 10, 17, 26, __. What is the next number?

    Answer: 37

    The differences are 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 — consecutive odd numbers — so the next number is 26 + 11 = 37.

  4. A report states: 'Most officers who scored highest on the OACP exam also scored highest in situational judgment.' What type of relationship does this most likely describe?

    Answer: Correlation

    The statement describes two variables trending together, which is a correlational relationship, not proven causation.

  5. If no violent crimes were committed in Zone A last month, and the report says Zone A had the lowest crime overall, which of the following is a valid logical inference?

    Answer: Zone A may have had non-violent crimes while still having the lowest overall crime count

    The absence of violent crime does not preclude the existence of non-violent offenses in the same zone.

  6. A supervisor argues: 'Officer Reyes is either fully committed or not committed at all.' This statement is an example of:

    Answer: A false dilemma

    A false dilemma presents only two extreme options when a range of possibilities actually exists.

  7. An investigator notes that three unrelated crimes occurred within 500 meters of one another over two weeks. What is the most analytically cautious interpretation?

    Answer: Geographic proximity may be coincidental but warrants further spatial analysis

    Geographic clustering may be significant but requires further analysis before assuming a causal link.