NYC FREE NYC Civil Service Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers 2 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: A supervisor assigns tasks to 4 employees: Kim, Lee, Mia, and Raj. Kim cannot work with Raj. Lee must work with Mia. If Kim is assigned to Project A, which of the following must be true?
- Raj is assigned to Project A
- Lee and Mia are assigned to the same project as Kim
- Raj is NOT assigned to Project A (Correct answer)
- Lee is assigned to Project A without Mia
Correct answer: Raj is NOT assigned to Project A
Since Kim cannot work with Raj, if Kim is on Project A, Raj must be on a different project.
Question 2: Study the pattern: 3, 6, 12, 24, ___. What is the next number?
- 36
- 42
- 48 (Correct answer)
- 30
Correct answer: 48
Each number is doubled, so 24 × 2 = 48.
Question 3: All city inspectors must pass a background check. Officer Torres passed a background check. Which conclusion is most valid?
- Officer Torres is a city inspector
- Officer Torres may or may not be a city inspector (Correct answer)
- All people who pass background checks are city inspectors
- Officer Torres failed his background check
Correct answer: Officer Torres may or may not be a city inspector
Passing a background check is required for inspectors but does not exclusively identify someone as one.
Question 4: A filing system organizes records alphabetically by last name. A new clerk files 'Martinez' before 'Mason.' Is this correct?
- Yes, because M comes before M
- No, because 'Mart' comes before 'Mas' alphabetically (Correct answer)
- Yes, because Martinez has more letters
- No, because Mason should always come first
Correct answer: No, because 'Mart' comes before 'Mas' alphabetically
Alphabetically, 'Mart' precedes 'Mas' so Martinez correctly comes before Mason.
Question 5: A city agency has 120 employees. 75% work full-time. How many employees work part-time?
- 90
- 30 (Correct answer)
- 45
- 75
Correct answer: 30
75% of 120 = 90 full-time, so 120 − 90 = 30 part-time.
Question 6: Read the argument: 'Response times improved after new radios were issued. Therefore, the new radios caused the improvement.' What is the flaw in this reasoning?
- The argument is logically sound
- Correlation is mistaken for causation (Correct answer)
- The data about response times is irrelevant
- The radios were issued too late
Correct answer: Correlation is mistaken for causation
Improvement occurring after an event does not prove the event caused the improvement—other factors could be responsible.
NYC FREE NYC Civil Service Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers 2
A supervisor assigns tasks to 4 employees: Kim, Lee, Mia, and Raj.
Kim cannot work with Raj.
Lee must work with Mia.
If Kim is assigned to Project A, which of the following must be true?