← All ND BAR Flashcard Decks

Mixed Deck — All ND BAR Topics Flashcards

100 cards from real ND BAR practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 20 Mixed Deck — All ND BAR Topics flashcards as text
  1. Under North Dakota law, what is the burden of proof in a criminal case?

    Answer: Beyond a reasonable doubt

    The prosecution must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard of proof in the legal system.

  2. Under North Dakota's fee-sharing rules, when may a North Dakota attorney share legal fees with a lawyer in another firm?

    Answer: When the division is proportionate to work performed or responsibility assumed, and the client consents in writing

    NDRPC Rule 1.5(e) permits fee division between lawyers in different firms if the division is proportionate to services performed or responsibility assumed, the client agrees in a signed writing, and the total fee is reasonable.

  3. What is an attorney's obligation regarding truthfulness in their representations to the court?

    Answer: The attorney must ensure that all statements made to the court are truthful and not misleading.

    Attorneys have a fundamental duty of candor to the tribunal under the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct. This means they must ensure all statements of fact or law made to the court are truthful and not misleading. An attorney cannot knowingly offer false evidence or make false statements, as this duty is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

  4. A North Dakota law firm uses a non-lawyer administrator to manage its files and billing. A client's information is inadvertently disclosed by the administrator to a third party. Who bears ethical responsibility?

    Answer: The supervising attorneys, who have a duty to establish proper oversight systems

    NDRPC Rule 5.3 requires lawyers with managerial authority to establish systems ensuring non-lawyer staff comply with professional obligations; supervisory attorneys bear ethical responsibility for failures caused by inadequate supervision.

  5. What is the parol evidence rule in North Dakota?

    Answer: Prior oral agreements cannot contradict a fully integrated written contract

    The parol evidence rule prevents introduction of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements that contradict the terms of a complete written contract.

  6. You have been asked to draft a letter to a client advising them of a recent development in their case. The client is anxious about the implications. What is the best approach to take in this letter?

    Answer: Provide a clear and concise summary of the development and its potential impact.

    When communicating with an anxious client, clarity and conciseness are paramount. The best approach is to provide a straightforward summary of the development and its potential impact, avoiding complex legal jargon. This helps the client understand the situation without unnecessary confusion or added stress, fostering trust and effective communication.

  7. For a North Dakota bar essay on contracts, when does the mirror-image rule apply?

    Answer: To acceptance of offers at common law, requiring acceptance match the offer exactly

    At common law, the mirror-image rule requires acceptance to be unequivocal and match the offer's terms precisely, or it becomes a counteroffer.

  8. An attorney in North Dakota receives a $10,000 settlement check payable to both the attorney and the client. The attorney is owed $4,000 in fees. How should the attorney handle these funds?

    Answer: Deposit the full amount in the trust account, then disburse $4,000 to herself and $6,000 to the client

    NDRPC Rule 1.15 requires depositing mixed funds in trust, then promptly disbursing the client's portion and transferring earned fees to the attorney's account.

  9. Under MBE Torts, a defendant who publishes a false statement of fact that harms the plaintiff's business without proving actual malice may be liable for:

    Answer: Product disparagement requiring actual economic loss

    Trade libel (product disparagement) requires proof of a false statement of fact about the plaintiff's goods or business and actual economic loss, distinct from personal defamation.

  10. Which of the following is NOT a required element of a valid contract?

    Answer: Written documentation

    Most contracts do not require a written form; offer, acceptance, and consideration are the core elements, with writing only required for specific contract types under the Statute of Frauds.

  11. When a contract is rescinded by mutual agreement, the legal effect is:

    Answer: Both parties are excused from future performance and the contract is treated as if it never existed

    Mutual rescission extinguishes all remaining duties under the original contract, effectively returning both parties to their pre-contract positions.

  12. A contract is voidable (not void) when:

    Answer: One party lacked contractual capacity due to age

    A contract made by a minor is voidable at the minor's option, not automatically void, because it protects the minor who can ratify or disaffirm upon reaching majority.

  13. When drafting a legal document, such as a contract, what is a critical aspect to ensure that the document is clear and enforceable?

    Answer: Ensuring that all parties’ obligations and rights are clearly defined and unambiguous

    For a legal document like a contract to be clear and enforceable, it is critical that all parties' obligations and rights are defined unambiguously. Vague or unclear language can lead to disputes, misinterpretations, and potential unenforceability in court. Precision in drafting ensures that the intent of the parties is clearly expressed and legally binding.

  14. The parol evidence rule generally prevents a party from introducing evidence of prior oral agreements that:

    Answer: Contradict or vary the terms of a fully integrated written contract

    The parol evidence rule bars extrinsic evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements that contradict the terms of a fully integrated written contract.

  15. Under MBE Torts, which element distinguishes negligence per se from ordinary negligence?

    Answer: A statute sets the standard of care

    Negligence per se arises when a defendant violates a statute designed to protect a class of persons from the type of harm that occurred, replacing the reasonable person standard.

  16. Under North Dakota property law, what redemption period follows a sheriff's sale in a mortgage foreclosure?

    Answer: 6 months

    North Dakota provides a 6-month statutory redemption period following a sheriff's sale in mortgage foreclosure under N.D.C.C. § 28-23-11.

  17. What is the North Dakota law on conspiracy?

    Answer: An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime, plus an overt act in furtherance

    Criminal conspiracy requires both an agreement to commit a crime and at least one overt act taken in furtherance of that agreement.

  18. Under MBE Criminal Procedure, which exception allows a warrantless search of a vehicle based on probable cause alone?

    Answer: Automobile exception

    The automobile exception permits a warrantless search of a vehicle and any container within it when there is probable cause to believe contraband or evidence of crime is present.

  19. Under North Dakota criminal law, what is the maximum sentence for a Class A felony?

    Answer: 20 years

    A Class A felony in North Dakota carries a maximum sentence of 20 years imprisonment under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-01.

  20. Under the doctrine of substantial performance, a party who substantially but not perfectly performs a contract is entitled to:

    Answer: The contract price minus the cost to remedy the deficiencies

    Substantial performance entitles the performing party to the contract price less the cost of remedying any defects, preventing forfeiture for minor deviations.