← All LSAT Flashcard Decks

Argument Flaw Identification Flashcards

7 cards from real LSAT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Argument Flaw Identification flashcards as text
  1. Mayor: Our city's crime rate dropped 15% after we installed new streetlights. Therefore, the streetlights caused the reduction in crime. Which flaw does this argument commit?

    Answer: It confuses correlation with causation

    The argument assumes that because one event followed another, the first caused the second — a classic post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.

  2. Nutritionist: Either you eat a balanced diet or you will develop serious health problems. You eat a balanced diet. Therefore, you will not develop serious health problems. What is the flaw?

    Answer: It affirms the disjunct, ignoring that other causes of health problems exist

    The argument treats 'balanced diet' as the only factor preventing health problems, ignoring genetics, exercise, and other variables.

  3. Senator: My opponent argues we should raise the minimum wage, but he has accepted donations from labor unions. His argument should therefore be dismissed. What flaw is present?

    Answer: Ad hominem — attacking the source rather than the argument

    The senator attacks the opponent's funding source rather than addressing the actual merits of the minimum wage argument.

  4. Coach: All of last year's championship teams had rigorous training programs. Our team has a rigorous training program. So our team will win the championship. What is the logical flaw?

    Answer: Affirming the consequent — treating a sufficient condition as necessary

    Rigorous training may be a feature of championship teams without being sufficient alone to guarantee a championship.

  5. Philosopher: This action is moral because wise people throughout history have always done it. What is the primary flaw in this reasoning?

    Answer: It appeals to tradition as a substitute for moral argument

    The argument uses historical practice as evidence of correctness without providing a reasoned justification for why tradition equals morality.

  6. Researcher: We surveyed 200 gym members and found they exercise four times per week on average. We can conclude that Americans exercise four times per week on average. What flaw does this contain?

    Answer: It draws a conclusion from an unrepresentative sample

    Gym members are not representative of all Americans; they are already a self-selected group predisposed to exercise.

  7. Editor: No great novel has ever been written quickly. This author took three years on her book. Therefore, her book must be great. Identify the flaw.

    Answer: It confuses a necessary condition for greatness with a sufficient one

    Taking a long time might be necessary for greatness without being enough on its own to guarantee it.