Practice Test GeeksLNAT Practice Test
← All LNAT Flashcard Decks

Technical Skills & Application Flashcards

7 cards from real LNAT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Technical Skills & Application flashcards as text

  1. A statute states: 'No vehicle may enter the park.' A maintenance crew needs to bring in a motorized lawnmower. Applying strict statutory interpretation, what is the correct conclusion?

    Answer: The lawnmower is prohibited because it is a vehicle

    Under strict literal interpretation, a motorized lawnmower qualifies as a vehicle and is therefore prohibited regardless of its purpose.

  2. In formal logic, which of the following is the contrapositive of 'If P then Q'?

    Answer: If not Q then not P

    The contrapositive of 'If P then Q' is 'If not Q then not P,' and it is logically equivalent to the original statement.

  3. A researcher finds that cities with more ice cream sales have more drowning deaths. The most rigorous conclusion is:

    Answer: A third variable (heat/summer) likely explains both

    Both ice cream sales and drowning increase in hot weather, making temperature a confounding variable that explains the correlation.

  4. Which argument form commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent?

    Answer: If A then B; B is true; therefore A is true

    Affirming the consequent incorrectly infers the antecedent (A) from the truth of the consequent (B).

  5. A law requires 'reasonable notice' before terminating a contract. A court must decide whether 24 hours constitutes reasonable notice for a commercial lease. Which interpretive tool is MOST appropriate?

    Answer: Purposive approach — consider the legislature's aim

    The purposive approach asks what protection the legislature intended to provide, which is most relevant to interpreting a vague standard like 'reasonable.'

  6. An argument states: 'All contracts require consideration. This agreement has no consideration. Therefore it is not a contract.' This is an example of:

    Answer: Modus tollens

    Modus tollens follows the form 'If P then Q; not Q; therefore not P,' which matches denying the consequent to deny the antecedent.

  7. In a LNAT reading passage, the author argues that mandatory minimum sentences 'have failed to deter crime.' A student wishes to weaken this argument most effectively. Which approach is best?

    Answer: Provide evidence that crime rates fell after mandatory minimums were introduced

    Showing crime fell after mandatory minimums were introduced directly challenges the claim that they failed to deter crime.