Logical Deduction Flashcards
7 cards from real LNAT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Logical Deduction flashcards as text
Argument: 'My client could not have committed the robbery at 9 pm because he was dining with me at 9 pm.' This is an example of:
Answer: Alibi / rebuttal evidence
Providing a location alibi is a direct rebuttal that undermines the prosecution's claim by showing a contradictory fact.
All statutory instruments must be laid before Parliament. This regulation was not laid before Parliament. Therefore:
Answer: The regulation is not a statutory instrument
By contrapositive: if not laid before Parliament, then not a statutory instrument.
Passage: 'Raising the minimum wage always increases unemployment.' Which finding most strengthens this?
Answer: A meta-analysis shows unemployment rises in 80% of cases after minimum wage increases
Empirical evidence showing unemployment rises in a majority of observed cases directly supports the causal claim.
P: If the appeal succeeds, the sentence is reduced. Q: If the sentence is reduced, the defendant is released early. R: The appeal did not succeed. What follows?
Answer: Nothing follows about the sentence
The conditionals only tell us what happens if the appeal succeeds; since it failed, the conditionals are not triggered and nothing can be deduced.
In a survey, 60% of respondents support capital punishment, yet juries rarely recommend it. Which best explains this paradox?
Answer: Jurors apply a higher standard of proof than abstract opinion allows
The act of deciding a real case imposes a higher evidential burden than expressing an abstract preference, explaining the gap.
Some precedents are overruled. All overruled precedents lose binding force. No persuasive authorities have binding force. Which is a valid conclusion?
Answer: Some precedents lose binding force
Some precedents are overruled, and all overruled precedents lose binding force, so some precedents lose binding force.
A logician says: 'This statement is false.' If the statement is true, it is false; if it is false, it is true. This is an example of:
Answer: The liar's paradox — a self-referential contradiction
The liar's paradox arises when a statement refers to its own truth value, producing an irresolvable contradiction.