Practice Test Geeks(LEAB) Law Enforcement Aptitude Battery Practice Test
← All LEAB Flashcard Decks

Reasoning and Information Ordering Flashcards

7 cards from real LEAB practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Reasoning and Information Ordering flashcards as text

  1. An officer receives five radio calls simultaneously. Which factor should determine which call to respond to first?

    Answer: The severity of the threat to human life in each call

    Law enforcement triage prioritizes threat to human life above all other factors, including call order or geographic proximity.

  2. A detective is organizing case files. Case A must be reviewed before Case B; Case C must be reviewed before Case A; Case D can be reviewed any time. What is a valid review order?

    Answer: C, A, D, B

    C before A, and A before B is satisfied by the order C, A, D, B since D has no constraint and B comes after A.

  3. A crime scene has the following evidence: muddy boot print, a torn piece of fabric, a dropped wallet, and a partial fingerprint. If only two items can be fully processed due to resource limits, which two provide the highest value for suspect identification?

    Answer: Wallet and partial fingerprint

    A wallet may contain direct identity information (ID, cards) and a fingerprint can be matched to a database, making these the highest-value identification items.

  4. An officer's notes say: 'Spoke to neighbor at 9 AM. Returned to station at 10:15 AM. Filed report at 11:00 AM. Court appearance at 2 PM.' The officer has a mandatory training from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM. Can the report be filed before training?

    Answer: Yes, the report is filed at 11:00 AM before training starts at 11:30 AM

    The report is filed at 11:00 AM and training begins at 11:30 AM, leaving a 30-minute gap — no conflict exists.

  5. Crime statistics show that Area X has 40 thefts per month and Area Y has 15 thefts per month. Resources are shifted from Y to X for one month, and thefts in X drop to 28 while thefts in Y rise to 22. What is the most logical inference?

    Answer: Crime may have displaced from X to Y rather than being prevented

    Total thefts remained similar (55 vs. 50) while the distribution shifted, suggesting displacement rather than true crime reduction.

  6. Which of the following best demonstrates inductive reasoning in a law enforcement context?

    Answer: An officer concludes a neighborhood has a drug problem after observing repeated transactions at the same corner

    Inductive reasoning moves from specific repeated observations to a general conclusion, as in inferring a neighborhood drug problem from multiple observed transactions.

  7. An officer reads: 'Suspect entered the east door at 10:03 AM, was seen on the second floor at 10:07 AM, and exited the west door at 10:14 AM.' Each floor takes approximately 3 minutes to traverse. How many floors could the suspect have visited?

    Answer: At most 3 floors

    With 11 minutes total and 3 minutes per floor, the suspect could traverse at most 3 floors (3+3+3=9 minutes), plus time for entry and exit.