Practice Test Geeks(LEAB) Law Enforcement Aptitude Battery Practice Test
← All LEAB Flashcard Decks

Reading and Written Comprehension Flashcards

7 cards from real LEAB practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Reading and Written Comprehension flashcards as text

  1. Read the following statute excerpt: 'A person commits theft if he or she knowingly obtains or exerts unauthorized control over property of another with intent to deprive the owner permanently of the use or benefit of the property.' Which element is REQUIRED to prove theft under this definition?

    Answer: The person must have acted knowingly with intent to permanently deprive

    The statute specifies that the person must 'knowingly' act with 'intent to deprive the owner permanently' — both mental state elements are required.

  2. A department policy reads: 'Officers shall not conduct a search of a vehicle without either (a) a valid search warrant, (b) consent of the owner, (c) probable cause in exigent circumstances, or (d) search incident to a lawful arrest.' An officer stops a car and the driver refuses to allow a search. The officer has no warrant and has not arrested anyone. Under this policy, may the officer search the vehicle?

    Answer: No, because none of the four permitted conditions are met

    Without a warrant, consent, exigent circumstances with probable cause, or a lawful arrest, none of the four conditions in the policy are satisfied.

  3. Read this passage: 'Miranda rights must be read to a suspect before any custodial interrogation. Custodial interrogation occurs when a person is in custody and subject to questioning by law enforcement. Statements made without a proper Miranda warning may be inadmissible in court.' A suspect is questioned at the scene of a crime but is told they are free to leave. Miranda was not read. Which statement is most accurate?

    Answer: The statements may be admissible because the suspect was not in custody

    The passage defines custodial interrogation as requiring both custody and questioning; since the suspect was told they were free to leave, custody did not exist.

  4. A legal glossary defines 'probable cause' as: 'A reasonable belief, based on specific articulable facts, that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime will be found in a specific place.' Which scenario best meets this definition?

    Answer: An officer smells marijuana coming from a car and sees a drug pipe in plain view

    Smelling marijuana combined with seeing a drug pipe provides specific, articulable facts creating a reasonable belief that evidence of a crime is present.

  5. Read this excerpt: 'An officer may use force that is reasonable and necessary under the totality of the circumstances. Factors considered include the severity of the crime, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat, and whether the suspect is actively resisting or attempting to evade arrest.' A suspect is arrested for jaywalking and immediately complies with the officer. Which level of force would most likely be considered reasonable under this standard?

    Answer: Verbal commands only, given the minor offense and compliance

    The offense is minor (jaywalking), the suspect poses no immediate threat, and there is no resistance, so only verbal commands would be reasonable under this standard.

  6. A municipal code reads: 'No person shall operate a motor vehicle on any public roadway between the hours of 11:00 PM and 5:00 AM with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or greater.' A driver is stopped at 10:45 PM with a BAC of 0.09 percent. Has this driver violated this ordinance?

    Answer: No, because the stop occurred before 11:00 PM

    Although the BAC exceeds 0.08%, the ordinance only applies between 11:00 PM and 5:00 AM, and the driver was stopped at 10:45 PM — before the restricted period began.

  7. A policy statement reads: 'Confidential informant identities shall not be disclosed in any public record, court document, or verbal communication with unauthorized personnel. Disclosure requires written authorization from the Chief of Police.' A detective mentions an informant's name to a patrol officer who is not assigned to the case. Which policy rule was violated?

    Answer: The detective disclosed to an unauthorized person without written authorization

    The policy prohibits verbal disclosure to unauthorized personnel, and the patrol officer not assigned to the case is unauthorized under this policy.