A buyer sues a seller for breach of an express warranty made in an oral sales pitch, but the signed final contract contains a merger clause and no such warranty. How does the parol evidence rule apply?
-
A
The oral warranty is always admissible because warranties are exempt from the rule
-
B
The oral warranty is admissible because the parol evidence rule applies only to land sales
-
C
The prior oral warranty is likely excluded because it contradicts or supplements a fully integrated writing
-
D
The merger clause is void under the UCC