← All ITE Flashcard Decks

Gastroenterology and Hepatology Flashcards

6 cards from real ITE practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Gastroenterology and Hepatology flashcards as text
  1. A 52-year-old woman with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) on ursodeoxycholic acid presents with pruritus, fatigue, and an alkaline phosphatase that remains 3× the upper limit of normal after 12 months of therapy. LFTs show ALT 55 U/L, bilirubin 1.1 mg/dL. Which second-line agent is most appropriate to add?

    Answer: Obeticholic acid

    Obeticholic acid (OCA), a farnesoid X receptor agonist, is FDA-approved as second-line therapy for PBC in patients with inadequate response to UDCA, defined as alkaline phosphatase ≥1.67× ULN and/or elevated bilirubin after 12 months. Cholestyramine and rifampin target pruritus symptomatically but do not alter disease progression. Fibrates (bezafibrate/fenofibrate) are used off-label in some European guidelines but are not FDA-approved for PBC. OCA is the guideline-endorsed add-on in this scenario.

  2. A 44-year-old man is found to have a 2.5 cm hepatic lesion on ultrasound done for elevated liver enzymes. He has no cirrhosis and no known liver disease. MRI shows a well-demarcated lesion with arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral nodular enhancement, and progressive centripetal fill-in on delayed phases. The most likely diagnosis and appropriate next step are:

    Answer: Hepatic hemangioma — reassurance and no further workup needed

    The described MRI pattern — peripheral nodular arterial enhancement with progressive centripetal fill-in ('light bulb' sign on T2, scalloped margins) — is pathognomonic for a hepatic cavernous hemangioma. In a non-cirrhotic patient without risk factors, this classic pattern on MRI is sufficient for diagnosis; no biopsy or further invasive workup is needed. HCC would show washout appearance in a cirrhotic liver. FNH shows a central scar and homogeneous arterial blush. Cholangiocarcinoma would show different ductal features.

  3. A 38-year-old woman with Crohn's disease on azathioprine and infliximab develops right lower quadrant pain, fever, and a palpable mass. CT imaging shows a phlegmon involving the terminal ileum with an adjacent 4 cm abscess. She has no peritonitis. The optimal initial management is:

    Answer: CT-guided percutaneous drainage plus antibiotics, with infliximab held

    In Crohn's disease complicated by an intra-abdominal abscess, the standard of care is source control first — percutaneous drainage (if technically feasible) plus broad-spectrum antibiotics — before any escalation of immunosuppression. Anti-TNF agents (infliximab) are contraindicated in the setting of undrained abscess because immunosuppression worsens septic outcomes. Emergent surgery is reserved for peritonitis, failure of drainage, or inaccessible abscesses. Colonoscopy and stricture dilation are not appropriate in the acute septic phase.

  4. A 61-year-old man with alcohol-related cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B) and a history of variceal bleeding is on nadolol. He develops refractory ascites requiring large-volume paracentesis every 2 weeks despite maximal diuretic therapy. Creatinine is 1.0 mg/dL, sodium is 128 mEq/L. He is listed for liver transplant. What is the most appropriate next intervention?

    Answer: Place a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

    TIPS is the most appropriate intervention for refractory ascites in a transplant candidate with preserved renal function (creatinine 1.0) and Child-Pugh B (not C, where benefit is less clear). TIPS reduces portal hypertension, eliminates or dramatically reduces the need for paracentesis, and can bridge patients to transplant. Midodrine/octreotide is used for hepatorenal syndrome, not refractory ascites. Terlipressin targets HRS-AKI, not hyponatremia per se. Carvedilol switch does not address the mechanical ascites problem. Contraindications to TIPS (hepatic encephalopathy, cardiac dysfunction) are not present here.

  5. A 57-year-old woman undergoes upper endoscopy for dysphagia. Biopsies from the mid-esophagus show ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field, with no response to an 8-week course of twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy. She has no peripheral eosinophilia. Which statement about her subsequent management is most accurate?

    Answer: Topical swallowed fluticasone or budesonide is first-line pharmacologic therapy after PPI failure

    After failure of PPI therapy (which itself can treat PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia and is required to confirm the EoE diagnosis), topical swallowed corticosteroids — fluticasone propionate (swallowed from an MDI) or budesonide oral suspension — are first-line pharmacologic treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Systemic steroids are not routinely used due to side effects. Six-food elimination diet (milk, wheat, egg, soy, nuts, seafood) is a validated non-pharmacologic option in adults. Endoscopic dilation is safe and effective for fibrostenotic EoE; perforation risk is low (10%.

  6. A 49-year-old man with newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a single lesion measuring 3.8 cm in a cirrhotic liver (Child-Pugh A, ECOG 0). No vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread is seen on imaging. He is placed on the transplant waitlist (Milan criteria met). While awaiting transplant, locoregional therapy is being considered. Which statement best reflects current evidence regarding bridging therapy?

    Answer: Bridging therapy is recommended to reduce dropout risk from waitlist progression, though no randomized trial has proven a post-transplant survival benefit over no bridging

    Bridging locoregional therapy (TACE, ablation, SBRT, Y-90) for HCC while awaiting transplant is widely recommended to prevent waitlist dropout due to tumor progression beyond Milan criteria. However, no randomized controlled trial has demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in post-transplant recurrence-free or overall survival compared to observation alone — the benefit is in reducing dropout, not necessarily improving post-transplant outcomes. SBRT is an accepted bridging modality in cirrhosis when technically appropriate. RFA/MWA can achieve complete ablation for lesions 3–5 cm, particularly with microwave technology, though rates are lower than for <3 cm lesions.