Writing Task 2: Discussion and Problem-Solution Essays Flashcards
7 cards from real IELTS practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Writing Task 2: Discussion and Problem-Solution Essays flashcards as text
A Task 2 prompt asks: 'What are the advantages and disadvantages of working from home?' This is:
Answer: An advantages-disadvantages essay, NOT a discussion or problem-solution essay
'Advantages and disadvantages' is a distinct essay type; it does not ask for a personal opinion or a discussion of opposing views, and has its own structure.
Which sentence best demonstrates a strong counterargument in a discussion essay about zoos?
Answer: Proponents of zoos contend that they play a vital role in conservation by funding breeding programmes for endangered species.
A strong counterargument engages with the strongest reason for the opposing view ('vital role in conservation'); the other options are weak or tangential.
What is wrong with using 'Firstly, secondly, thirdly, fourthly...' as the only cohesive device in a Task 2 essay?
Answer: It becomes mechanical and repetitive, suggesting a limited range of cohesive devices
Overusing numeral linkers signals a limited vocabulary for cohesion; high-scoring essays use a variety of cohesive devices (pronouns, synonyms, discourse markers).
Which sentence correctly uses a passive construction to discuss a societal issue without naming a specific agent?
Answer: It has been argued that social media platforms should be regulated more strictly.
'It has been argued that' is the correct academic passive for attributing a widely held view without specifying a particular agent.
A student's conclusion reads: 'To summarise, poverty is a complex issue that requires urgent attention from all stakeholders.' What is the main weakness?
Answer: It is too vague and does not restate the essay's specific arguments or position
A vague conclusion that merely says 'it is complex' fails to restate the essay's specific arguments and position, reducing the Task Achievement score.
What is the function of a 'concession' sentence in a discussion essay?
Answer: To acknowledge the validity of the opposing view before developing your own argument
A concession acknowledges merit in the opposing view, which demonstrates critical thinking and adds sophistication; it is typically followed by the writer's counterpoint.
Which phrase best introduces the writer's opinion after discussing both views?
Answer: On balance, I would argue that the benefits of renewable energy outweigh the initial costs.
'On balance' signals a carefully weighed conclusion; 'I would argue' is appropriately hedged for academic opinion, and the sentence avoids redundancy.