Research Methods & Evidence-Based Practice Flashcards
7 cards from real ICF practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Research Methods & Evidence-Based Practice flashcards as text
Which of the following best describes 'triangulation' in qualitative coaching research?
Answer: Combining multiple data sources or methods to strengthen findings
Triangulation enhances research credibility by cross-checking findings using multiple data sources, methods, or researchers.
A coach practitioner reads a study with a p-value of 0.03. What does this indicate?
Answer: There is a 3% probability the results occurred by chance if there were no real effect
A p-value of 0.03 means there is a 3% probability that the observed result would occur by chance assuming the null hypothesis is true.
In the context of evidence-based coaching, 'practitioner expertise' is considered:
Answer: One of three pillars alongside research evidence and client preferences
Evidence-based practice integrates practitioner expertise, best available research evidence, and client characteristics/preferences as equally important pillars.
What is the purpose of a literature review in a coaching research study?
Answer: To document the existing body of knowledge and identify gaps
A literature review surveys existing research to establish context, identify what is already known, and highlight gaps the current study will address.
Which ethical principle requires that coaching research participants fully understand the study before agreeing to participate?
Answer: Informed consent
Informed consent ensures participants voluntarily agree to participate after receiving clear, complete information about the study's purpose, risks, and procedures.
A coaching researcher finds a correlation of r = 0.65 between coaching session frequency and goal attainment. This means:
Answer: Higher session frequency is strongly associated with greater goal attainment
A correlation of 0.65 indicates a moderately strong positive association, but correlation does not establish causation.
Which of the following is an example of 'researcher bias' in a coaching study?
Answer: A coach-researcher who unconsciously interprets data to confirm their own coaching approach is effective
Researcher bias occurs when a researcher's assumptions or investments in the outcome influence how they collect, analyze, or interpret data.