Harrison Assessment Tests Enjoyment Performance Theory 4 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: How does Harrison Assessments prevent acquiescence bias in its enjoyment measurement methodology?
- It uses forced-ranking comparisons between task preferences rather than agree/disagree scales (Correct answer)
- It relies on manager observation to override self-reported enjoyment
- It removes all subjective questions and uses only cognitive tasks
- It randomly reverses question polarity throughout the assessment
Correct answer: It uses forced-ranking comparisons between task preferences rather than agree/disagree scales
Harrison's comparative format asks respondents to rank preferences against each other, reducing the tendency to agree with all positive statements.
Question 2: According to EPT, which factor most strongly predicts whether a high-performing employee will accept a lateral move?
- Whether the lateral role offers higher compensation
- Whether the new role's task profile aligns with the employee's enjoyment patterns (Correct answer)
- Whether peers in the same band have made similar moves
- Whether the manager strongly recommends the move
Correct answer: Whether the new role's task profile aligns with the employee's enjoyment patterns
EPT predicts that lateral move acceptance and success depends on enjoyment alignment with the new role's task demands, more than compensation or social pressure.
Question 3: What is the significance of the '6-factor model' within Harrison's Enjoyment Performance Theory framework?
- It identifies six cognitive abilities that predict management readiness
- It maps six clusters of task enjoyment to career success indicators (Correct answer)
- It outlines six stages of employee disengagement progression
- It lists six mandatory eligibility criteria for executive selection
Correct answer: It maps six clusters of task enjoyment to career success indicators
Harrison's 6-factor model groups enjoyment traits into clusters that collectively predict performance and satisfaction across different career domains.
Question 4: An employee scores high on 'frankness' but low on 'diplomacy' in a Harrison Assessment. EPT would predict what outcome in a client-facing role?
- Excellent performance because clients respect honesty
- Potential relationship damage due to an imbalance favoring bluntness over tact (Correct answer)
- No significant impact since communication style is trainable
- Superior performance in sales specifically because frankness closes deals
Correct answer: Potential relationship damage due to an imbalance favoring bluntness over tact
EPT's paradox model warns that extreme frankness without diplomacy creates interpersonal friction, particularly in client-facing contexts requiring nuanced communication.
Question 5: Which EPT principle supports the practice of job crafting in organizational development?
- Employees who reshape their tasks toward enjoyed activities show sustained performance gains (Correct answer)
- Job crafting only benefits extroverted employees who enjoy variety
- EPT discourages job crafting because it reduces standardization
- Job crafting is valid only when mandated by HR policy
Correct answer: Employees who reshape their tasks toward enjoyed activities show sustained performance gains
EPT directly supports job crafting because aligning daily task content with personal enjoyment profiles increases engagement and performance sustainability.
Question 6: In Harrison's model, what distinguishes 'behavioral tendencies' from 'competencies'?
- Behavioral tendencies are enjoyment-driven natural inclinations; competencies are learned abilities (Correct answer)
- Competencies are innate while behavioral tendencies are trained responses
- There is no meaningful distinction — they measure the same construct
- Behavioral tendencies are measured by observation; competencies by self-report
Correct answer: Behavioral tendencies are enjoyment-driven natural inclinations; competencies are learned abilities
EPT separates what people naturally tend toward (behavioral tendencies tied to enjoyment) from what they have been trained to do (competencies), since both affect performance differently.
Question 7: How does EPT frame the relationship between task enjoyment and creativity in knowledge workers?
- Creativity is unrelated to enjoyment; it depends solely on IQ
- Employees who enjoy their tasks generate more creative solutions due to intrinsic motivation (Correct answer)
- Enjoyed tasks reduce creativity by creating complacency
- Creativity peaks only in mildly disliked tasks where challenge drives innovation
Correct answer: Employees who enjoy their tasks generate more creative solutions due to intrinsic motivation
EPT aligns with intrinsic motivation research showing that enjoyment reduces cognitive friction and fosters the exploratory thinking that underlies creativity.
How does Harrison Assessments prevent acquiescence bias in its enjoyment measurement methodology?