Data Insights: Two-Part Analysis Flashcards
7 cards from real GMAT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Data Insights: Two-Part Analysis flashcards as text
A Two-Part Analysis question describes a verbal logic relationship: identify a statement that must be true and one that could be true. These differ because:
Answer: 'Must be true' holds in all cases while 'could be true' holds in at least one case
A must-be-true statement is always valid; a could-be-true statement is valid in at least one scenario.
Two employees split a $1,200 bonus so one gets twice the other. The smaller share is:
Answer: $400
If shares are x and 2x, then 3x = 1200, so x = 400.
In the same $1,200 split, the larger share is:
Answer: $800
2x = 2(400) = $800.
A data table shows quarterly sales. You must select the quarter with the largest increase and the quarter with the largest decrease from the prior quarter. What computation identifies each?
Answer: The difference between each quarter and the one before it
Period-over-period differences reveal the largest rise and the largest fall.
A car rental costs $30 plus $0.25 per mile. You must find the mileage giving a $55 total and one giving an $80 total. The mileage for $55 is:
Answer: 100
30 + 0.25m = 55 gives 0.25m = 25, so m = 100.
Using the same rental formula, the mileage giving an $80 total is:
Answer: 200
30 + 0.25m = 80 gives 0.25m = 50, so m = 200.
Why does Two-Part Analysis reward setting up both conditions before checking the answer column?
Answer: It lets you efficiently test each shared option against two precise targets
Defining both targets first turns selection into quick verification against the shared options.