Defamation and Privacy Torts Flashcards
7 cards from real FYLSX practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Defamation and Privacy Torts flashcards as text
What is the primary distinction between libel and slander?
Answer: Libel involves written or fixed-medium statements; slander involves spoken statements
Libel is defamation in a written or otherwise fixed, permanent form, while slander is defamation conveyed through transient spoken words.
Which element is NOT required to establish a prima facie case of defamation?
Answer: Intent by the defendant to harm the plaintiff's reputation
Defamation does not require intent to harm; private-figure plaintiffs need only show negligence, and the tort can be committed without any purpose to injure.
Under New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a public official suing for defamation must prove:
Answer: Actual malice—knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth
The Supreme Court held in NYT v. Sullivan that public officials must prove actual malice—that the defendant knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for its truth or falsity.
Which of the following is a complete defense to a defamation claim?
Answer: Substantial truth of the defamatory statement
Truth (or substantial truth) is an absolute defense to defamation because a true statement, however harmful to reputation, cannot support a defamation claim.
The 'publication' element of defamation is satisfied when:
Answer: The defamatory statement is communicated to at least one person other than the plaintiff
Publication requires only that the defamatory statement be communicated to a single third party—it need not reach a mass audience.
Which of the following is a classic example of defamation per se?
Answer: Falsely accusing someone of committing a crime of moral turpitude
Falsely accusing someone of a crime involving moral turpitude is one of the traditional categories of defamation per se, allowing recovery of general damages without proof of special damages.
Under the Gertz v. Robert Welch standard, a private figure plaintiff suing for defamation on a matter of public concern must prove at minimum:
Answer: Negligence by the defendant in publishing the false statement
Gertz held that states may define the appropriate standard of liability for private-figure plaintiffs but must require at least negligence; strict liability is unconstitutional in this context.