Free PTE Academic Knowledge Questions and Answers

Question 1

Draws conclusions about values by using declarations of fact.

Accepted Answer

Naturalistic fallacy

Answer

The naturalistic fallacy is the error of deriving 'ought' from 'is,' meaning attempting to deduce ethical or moral conclusions (values) solely from factual statements about the natural world. It incorrectly assumes that what is natural or factual is inherently good or ought to be. This precisely matches the description of drawing conclusions about values from declarations of fact.

Question 2

Comparing similar objects (bow and arrow).

Accepted Answer

Morphemes

Answer

Morphemes are the smallest meaningful units of language, such as 'bow' and 'arrow' as individual words. While the phrase 'Comparing similar objects' describes an analogy, if 'bow' and 'arrow' are considered as distinct meaningful units, they are examples of morphemes. The question likely intends to identify the linguistic term for such fundamental units, despite the potentially misleading introductory phrase.

Question 3

Affixes following the word.

Accepted Answer

Suffixes

Answer

Suffixes are a type of affix that are added to the end of a word to change its meaning or grammatical function. The definition 'Affixes following the word' precisely describes what a suffix is, as they always appear after the root word. This distinguishes them from prefixes, which appear before the word.

Question 4

Primary concepts on the one hand, illustrative details on the other.

Accepted Answer

2 column charts

Answer

A 2-column chart is a common organizational tool used to visually separate and compare two distinct categories of information. This format is ideal for presenting 'primary concepts on the one hand' and their corresponding 'illustrative details on the other,' allowing for clear differentiation and easy understanding of their relationship. Each column serves to categorize one aspect of the information, fulfilling the described purpose.

Question 5

Introduced as irrelevant information to divert attention away from relevant issues.

Accepted Answer

Red herring fallacy

Answer

A red herring fallacy is a logical fallacy where an irrelevant topic is introduced into an argument to divert the audience's attention from the original issue. The purpose is to mislead or distract, making the audience focus on something else rather than the actual point of contention. This perfectly matches the definition provided, as it describes introducing irrelevant information to divert attention.

PTE Practice Test

PTE Practice Test

Free PTE Academic Knowledge Questions and Answers