FREE PMI-PBA Certification Analysis Questions and Answers
The business analyst discovers a project objective with no corresponding requirement after the project has been completed. What could have been done to identify this problem prior to delivery?
Tracing requirements involves establishing and maintaining links between project objectives, requirements, design elements, and testing activities throughout the project lifecycle. By creating a clear traceability matrix or using traceability tools, the business analyst can ensure that each project objective is supported by corresponding requirements. This proactive approach helps prevent the situation where a project objective lacks a corresponding requirement, enhancing the alignment between objectives and the work carried out during the project.
A cost-benefit analysis of alternative solution options is being done by a business analyst. The predicted growth rate is clearly highly relevant to the stakeholders. Which method will make it possible for the business analyst to find this information?
Net Present Value (NPV) is a financial metric used in cost-benefit analysis to assess the profitability of an investment or project over time. It involves estimating future cash flows, discounting them back to the present value, and subtracting the initial investment cost. By incorporating predicted growth rates, NPV helps stakeholders understand the potential financial gains or losses associated with different solution options. A positive NPV indicates that the investment is likely to be profitable, and the predicted growth rate plays a key role in determining this outcome.
A requirement has changed, the business analyst learns while validating a project solution. The company logo is displayed in the upper-right corner of the window rather than the upper-left. The developer responds that one of the stakeholders explicitly requested the change when the business analyst inquires about the change. What is the right course of action for the business analyst?
The right course of action for the business analyst, after learning that a requirement has changed (company logo displayed in a different corner of the window) due to a stakeholder request, is to discuss the change in the next stakeholder meeting. In this situation, it's important for the business analyst to ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the change and its implications. By discussing the change in the next stakeholder meeting, the business analyst can provide an opportunity for stakeholders to understand the rationale behind the change, address any concerns, and confirm that the change aligns with the overall project goals and requirements. Open communication helps ensure that all stakeholders are on the same page and that changes are well-coordinated and properly documented.
Requirements Project elicitation is currently taking place. The production, acquisition, and marketing divisions seek to include particular specifications. In three months, the CEO must be deployed. Which of the following steps is more likely to contribute to the project's success?
Conducting a stakeholder analysis and balancing requirements by understanding the relative power associated with each stakeholder group is more likely to contribute to the project's success. In a project involving multiple divisions and stakeholders, understanding the needs, expectations, and influence of each stakeholder group is crucial. By conducting a stakeholder analysis, the business analyst can identify key stakeholders, assess their interests, power, and potential impact on the project. Balancing requirements involves managing competing interests and ensuring that the project's goals align with the overall organizational objectives. Given the urgency of the CEO's deployment and the involvement of different divisions, analyzing stakeholders' relative power helps prioritize requirements effectively, allocate resources efficiently, and manage expectations. This approach enhances collaboration, minimizes conflicts, and increases the chances of successfully meeting the project's objectives.
An interested party wants to change a current functionality. Which of the following criteria would be considered to assess how much the product would change?
A Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) is a tool that helps establish and track relationships between requirements and other project elements. It aids in understanding how changes to a particular requirement can impact various aspects of the project, including other requirements, design elements, testing activities, and more. By using the RTM, the business analyst can assess the potential ripple effects of the proposed change on the product and identify the extent of modifications required throughout the project. This analysis provides a comprehensive view of how much the product would change as a result of the requested functionality change.
At a nearby pizza joint, automated order entry software is being implemented under the direction of a business analyst. The ordering process takes too long and frequently results in inaccurate orders, thus the business analyst has very little knowledge about the project. What action needs to be taken by the business analyst next?
Given that the ordering process takes too long and frequently results in inaccurate orders, it's essential for the business analyst to understand the current challenges, pain points, and specific requirements from the manager's perspective. By conducting a requirements gathering session, the business analyst can gather firsthand insights from the manager about the issues faced, the desired improvements, and any specific needs for the automated order entry software. This information will help the business analyst gather relevant requirements and ensure that the software solution addresses the identified problems effectively.
A software problem was discovered during user acceptability testing. What action should the business analyst take next to investigate and address the disparity as part of the root cause analysis?
A fishbone diagram, also known as an Ishikawa diagram or a cause-and-effect diagram, is a visual tool used to identify and analyze potential root causes of a problem. By categorizing potential causes into different branches of the diagram, the business analyst can systematically explore various factors that might contribute to the software problem. This analysis aids in understanding the underlying causes and helps guide the team in identifying appropriate solutions to address the issue effectively.
A nationwide corporation with locations across the nation has implemented a technology that enables employees to view their health benefits online. The project team's business analyst validates solution results to see whether the solution has produced the expected business outcome. What is the most effective way to learn how satisfied the staff members are with the solution?
A survey allows the business analyst to gather feedback directly from the staff members regarding their experience with the implemented solution. By asking specific questions about their satisfaction levels, ease of use, any challenges they encountered, and their overall perception of the solution, the business analyst can gain valuable insights into how well the solution meets their needs and expectations. Surveys provide quantitative and qualitative data that can help assess user satisfaction and identify areas for improvement, enabling the organization to make informed decisions based on user feedback.
The creation of a solution scope is a joint effort between the client and the business analyst. It is crucial that the client:
Collaboration between the client and the business analyst is essential to define the solution scope accurately. The client's input is vital in ensuring that their needs, expectations, and requirements are thoroughly understood and translated into the scope of the solution. Clear and detailed requirements provided by the client allow the business analyst to effectively document and communicate the scope, which ultimately contributes to the successful delivery of a solution that meets the client's objectives.
A sponsor asks for a new specification. The majority of the information required for this demand doesn't exist, the business analyst argues, thus it can't be implemented. The demand should be postponed until the required data is available, then added to a subsequent project, suggests the business analyst. The supporter concurs. What action is next for the business analyst?
Communication is essential to keep stakeholders informed about changes in requirements, project scope, or any decisions made. By communicating that the status of the requirement has changed and providing an update to the relevant parties, the business analyst ensures that everyone involved is aware of the decision to postpone the requirement and understands the reasons behind it. This helps maintain transparency, prevents misunderstandings, and keeps all stakeholders aligned with the project's developments.
After a test session, a business analyst is looking over a discrepancy report. A flaw has been discovered by the discrepancy report, which the business analyst now needs to fix. Which of the following factors should the business analyst apply in order to determine the best course of action in light of the subpar test result?
To determine the best course of action in light of a subpar test result and a flaw discovered in a discrepancy report, the business analyst should determine if the defect is in the solution developed, in the original requirement, or in the test case. Analyzing the nature of the defect is crucial to understand its origin and the appropriate corrective action. By identifying whether the flaw is due to an issue in the solution developed, a misunderstanding or ambiguity in the original requirement, or a problem with the test case itself, the business analyst can pinpoint where the problem occurred. This analysis helps guide the appropriate steps for rectifying the defect, whether it involves revising the solution, clarifying the requirement, or adjusting the test case to align with the intended outcome.
A business analyst has been requested to look at an issue. The results of this inquiry will help create a business case. The business analyst first seeks to comprehend the current business procedures of the company. Which approach ought the business analyst to take?
Observation involves directly observing and analyzing the current business processes, interactions, and workflows within the company. By closely observing how tasks are performed, how information flows, and how employees engage with systems and tools, the business analyst gains firsthand insights into the existing procedures. This approach helps the business analyst understand the actual practices, challenges, and opportunities within the organization, forming a solid foundation for creating a well-informed business case.
In order to join a new market niche, a corporation is creating a new e-commerce platform. When the government introduces a new set of rules, development is already well under way. What action ought the business analyst to take?
When a government introduces new rules that affect a project, such as the development of a new e-commerce platform for entering a new market niche, the appropriate action for the business analyst is to evaluate the impact of the change on the project schedule. Government regulations can have a significant impact on project timelines, requirements, resources, and overall project plans. The business analyst should assess how the new rules will affect the project's scope, development timeline, budget, and any other relevant aspects. By evaluating the impact, the business analyst can inform stakeholders about potential delays, necessary adjustments, and any required modifications to ensure compliance with the new regulations while minimizing disruptions to the project's progress.
A user from a department that wasn't involved in the requirements analysis logs a defect during user acceptability testing. The user need to have been: in order to prevent this predicament and lessen its effects on the project.
To prevent the situation of a user from a department that wasn't involved in the requirements analysis logging a defect during user acceptability testing and to lessen its effects on the project, the user needed to have been identified as a stakeholder as part of the stakeholder analysis. Stakeholder analysis involves identifying all potential stakeholders who could have an impact on or be impacted by the project. This includes representatives from various departments and user groups. By thoroughly conducting stakeholder analysis, the business analyst can ensure that all relevant stakeholders, including users from different departments, are identified and engaged early in the project. This involvement helps in gathering comprehensive requirements, understanding diverse needs, and minimizing the likelihood of surprises or defects during user acceptability testing.
To decide whether formal signoff for the project should be necessary, a business analyst is collaborating with the project manager, business auditors, and project stakeholders. What justification would the business analyst give the group for formal signoff?
In an iterative project life cycle, where projects are developed in multiple phases or iterations, it's still important to have clear points of alignment and agreement between stakeholders, project managers, and business auditors. Formal signoff serves as a documented confirmation that all parties are in agreement that the project's current phase or deliverables meet the defined requirements and objectives. This helps manage expectations, prevent misunderstandings, and establish a clear understanding of what has been achieved. Even in an iterative context, having formal signoff at key milestones provides a sense of closure and a baseline for moving forward with subsequent iterations.
The management of a corporation has chosen to introduce a new product. Users may not embrace a new product that requires them to alter their current behaviors, nevertheless, is a concern. Business analysts ought to:
In situations where resistance to change is anticipated, effective communication is essential. Business analysts should clearly convey the reasons behind the new product introduction, its benefits, and how it aligns with the company's objectives. Addressing users' concerns and potential tensions can help ease their worries, provide them with a clear understanding of the purpose and advantages of the new product, and promote a more receptive attitude towards the changes. Effective communication strategies can play a significant role in gaining user buy-in and increasing the likelihood of successful product adoption.