Free NPOST Police Reading & Grammar Question and Answers 1 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: An employee's workstation, locker, or city-owned car may be searched at any time, with or without the employee's knowledge, according to city regulation. An employee of the city has reported that the elected City Controller was seen smoking marijuana behind the city building and putting a baggie containing a green leafy substance in his desk about an hour ago. As a result of this report, Officer Randall is asked by his supervisor to search the City Controller's desk. Officer Ryan presented the secretary with a documented copy of the city policy when she refused to permit the search on behalf of the City Controller. The City Controller was on a job site checking a city-owned warehouse when the secretary contacted him. He gave the secretary instructions to decline the search because he is an elected politician. Officer Randall pushed his way through the City Controller's desk, past the secretary. Nothing suspicious was discovered. The event resulted in the secretary breaking her arm. The city worker who complained to the city controller was well known to harbor strong feelings against the city controller because he had fired him the month before for being late.<br> <br> What legal justification does Officer Ryan have for wanting to search the City Controller's desk?
- city policy (Correct answer)
- inherent police power
- search warrant
- imminent threat of the destruction of evidence
Correct answer: city policy
The passage explicitly states, 'An employee's workstation, locker, or city-owned car may be searched at any time, with or without the employee's knowledge, according to city regulation.' Officer Ryan even presented the secretary with a documented copy of this city policy. Therefore, the primary legal justification for the search, as presented in the text, is the existing city policy.
Question 2: Choose the phrase that is written properly.
- Me and Officer Sanchez drove to the scene of the crime.
- Officer Sanchez and I drove to the scene of the crime. (Correct answer)
- Officer Sanchez and me drove to the scene of the crime.
- I and Officer Sanchez drove to the scene of the crime.
Correct answer: Officer Sanchez and I drove to the scene of the crime.
The correct phrase uses 'Officer Sanchez and I' because 'I' is the correct subjective pronoun to use when it is part of the subject of a sentence (who performed the action of driving). When referring to oneself and another person, it is also considered polite to mention the other person first. Options A and C incorrectly use 'me' as a subject.
Question 3: Find the incorrect word in the next phrase. <br> The surprising news anemated the conversation amongst the group.
- anemated (Correct answer)
- amongst
- surprising
- conversation
Correct answer: anemated
The word 'anemated' is misspelled in the given phrase. The correct spelling for the word meaning to make something lively or spirited is 'animated.' The other words in the sentence are spelled correctly and used appropriately within the context.
Question 4: Choose the phrase that is written properly.
- The officers, last week, have self-defense training.
- Last week, the officers has self-defense training.
- Last week, the officers had self-defense training. (Correct answer)
- Last week, the officers have self-defense training.
Correct answer: Last week, the officers had self-defense training.
The phrase 'Last week' indicates that the action occurred in the past, requiring the past tense verb 'had.' Option C correctly uses 'had' for a past event. Options A and D use 'have,' which is present tense, and option B uses 'has,' which is present tense and also incorrect for a plural subject ('officers').
Question 5: "The shooting occurred at 3:27 on Monday morning." Which word has the error?
- morning
- shooting
- early
- occured (Correct answer)
Correct answer: occured
The word 'occured' is misspelled in the sentence. The correct spelling is 'occurred,' with two 'c's and two 'r's. The other words in the sentence are spelled correctly and used appropriately.
Question 6: Which of the following phrases lacks proper grammar?
- .All the witness gave good statements. (Correct answer)
- The incident report has a number of issues.
- You have to finish the report on the traffic accident before you can go home.
- The accident happened on Seventh street at two-thirty in the afternoon.
Correct answer: .All the witness gave good statements.
The phrase '.All the witness gave good statements.' contains two grammatical errors. First, there is an unnecessary period before 'All.' Second, 'witness' is singular, but the quantifier 'All the' implies a plural subject, which should be 'witnesses.' The verb 'gave' is plural, matching 'witnesses,' not 'witness.'
Question 7: An employee's workstation, locker, or city-owned car may be searched at any time, with or without the employee's knowledge, according to city regulation. An employee of the city has reported that the elected City Controller was seen smoking marijuana behind the city building and putting a baggie containing a green leafy substance in his desk about an hour ago. As a result of this report, Officer Randall is asked by his supervisor to search the City Controller's desk. Officer Ryan presented the secretary with a documented copy of the city policy when she refused to permit the search on behalf of the City Controller. The City Controller was on a job site checking a city-owned warehouse when the secretary contacted him. He gave the secretary instructions to decline the search because he is an elected politician. Officer Randall pushed his way through the City Controller's desk, past the secretary. Nothing suspicious was discovered. The event resulted in the secretary breaking her arm. The city worker who complained to the city controller was well known to harbor strong feelings against the city controller because he had fired him the month before for being late.<br> <br> Based on the passage, which of the following statements is accurate?
- The city worker's report of a crime is reliable.
- The city worker had a motive to harm the reputation of the City Controller. (Correct answer)
- The city worker who reported the crime actually saw what he reported.
- The City Controller took the bag of marijuana before the officer searched the drawer.
Correct answer: The city worker had a motive to harm the reputation of the City Controller.
The passage explicitly states, 'The city worker who complained to the city controller was well known to harbor strong feelings against the city controller because he had fired him the month before for being late.' This sentence directly indicates that the city worker had a personal grudge and a clear motive to potentially fabricate or exaggerate a report to harm the City Controller's reputation.
An employee's workstation, locker, or city-owned car may be searched at any time, with or without the employee's knowledge, according to city regulation.
An employee of the city has reported that the elected City Controller was seen smoking marijuana behind the city building and putting a baggie containing a green leafy substance in his desk about an hour ago.
As a result of this report, Officer Randall is asked by his supervisor to search the City Controller's desk.
Officer Ryan presented the secretary with a documented copy of the city policy when she refused to permit the search on behalf of the City Controller.
The City Controller was on a job site checking a city-owned warehouse when the secretary contacted him.
He gave the secretary instructions to decline the search because he is an elected politician.
Officer Randall pushed his way through the City Controller's desk, past the secretary.
Nothing suspicious was discovered.
The event resulted in the secretary breaking her arm.
The city worker who complained to the city controller was well known to harbor strong feelings against the city controller because he had fired him the month before for being late.
What legal justification does Officer Ryan have for wanting to search the City Controller's desk?