Explanation:
The report indicates a correlation between green spaces and lower crime rates.
Explanation:
The first participant is drawing a conclusion based on a small and unrepresentative sample of weather events.
Explanation:
The company claims the built-in projector will change how people use their phones.
Explanation:
This option directly supports the conclusion with scientific evidence.
Explanation:
Experts are concerned about battery life and demand for the feature.
Explanation:
The second participant clarifies that global warming is about long-term average temperature changes.
Explanation:
The company argues that the study’s results are invalid due to its methodological issues.
Explanation:
The passage specifically mentions improvements in those who did aerobic activities.
Explanation:
The passage states that the text does not provide any information regarding the judge’s beliefs.
Explanation:
The effectiveness of the drug is unclear due to conflicting claims between the company and the independent study.
Explanation:
The study found significant improvements in cognitive function for those who exercised regularly.