A statement against interest is an exception to the hearsay rule and can be admissible if it was made by a person who is now unavailable and was against their own interest at the time it was made. Since the witness is unavailable, the prosecution can use this exception to admit the statement.
Expectation damages aim to put the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed. Maria would be entitled to expectation damages, which would cover the difference between the value of the car as promised and the value of any alternative she had to obtain due to David’s breach.
In this scenario, the doctrine of negligence applies. Negligence involves a failure to exercise reasonable care that results in harm to another person. Since Sam’s actions were negligent and caused injury, he is liable under the principles of negligence.
Laws that restrict fundamental rights, such as the First Amendment right to freedom of speech, are subject to strict scrutiny. This means the law must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. A total ban on political protest in public parks is likely to be considered a significant restriction on speech and thus subject to strict scrutiny.
Exigent circumstances allow police to make an arrest without a warrant if they witness a crime occurring or if there is an immediate need to act to prevent harm, escape, or destruction of evidence. Since the police observed Karen committing a crime, this is a classic example of exigent circumstances that justifies the warrantless arrest.
