Free CCP Geriatric Patient Assessment Questions and Answers 1 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: An 84-year-old male resident of an assisted living facility reports two falls in the past three months. The consultant pharmacist performs a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test to assess his mobility and fall risk. The resident, using his standard walker, completes the test in 18 seconds. Based on this result, what is the most appropriate interpretation and action?
- The resident has normal mobility for his age and no specific intervention is required.
- The result indicates a high risk for future falls, and a multifactorial fall risk assessment should be initiated. (Correct answer)
- The resident should be re-tested without his walker to get a more accurate baseline.
- The TUG test is inconclusive without a simultaneous cognitive assessment.
Correct answer: The result indicates a high risk for future falls, and a multifactorial fall risk assessment should be initiated.
A Timed Up and Go (TUG) test result of 14 seconds or more is indicative of a high risk for falls. A time of 18 seconds clearly falls into this high-risk category. Therefore, the most appropriate next step is to initiate a comprehensive, multifactorial fall risk assessment, which would include a medication review for fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs), environmental assessment, and evaluation of other contributing factors. A time of less than 10 seconds is generally considered normal for healthy elderly individuals, making 18 seconds well outside the normal range. Testing without the resident's usual assistive device would not provide a realistic assessment of their daily functional mobility. While cognitive impairment can contribute to fall risk, the TUG test itself is a validated screening tool for mobility and fall risk independent of a separate cognitive screen.
Question 2: A consultant pharmacist is conducting a comprehensive geriatric assessment. To evaluate the patient's ability to perform complex tasks required for independent living, such as managing finances and taking medications correctly, which of the following functional domains should be assessed?
- Palliative Performance Scale (PPS)
- Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)
- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) (Correct answer)
- Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Correct answer: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) are complex skills needed to live independently in the community. They include tasks like managing finances, taking medications as prescribed, shopping, preparing meals, and using the telephone. In contrast, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) refer to basic self-care tasks such as bathing, dressing, eating, and toileting. A decline in IADLs often precedes a decline in ADLs and can be an early indicator of cognitive or functional decline. The Palliative Performance Scale assesses functional decline in palliative care, and the Geriatric Depression Scale is a screening tool for mood.
Question 3: When administering the Mini-Cog™ as part of a cognitive screen, the pharmacist asks the patient to recall three unrelated words and then to draw a clock showing the time 'ten past eleven'. The patient recalls one of the three words and draws a clock with the numbers correctly placed, but the hands pointing to 10 and 11. How should this result be scored and interpreted?
- Score: 3 (1 for word recall, 2 for clock draw); indicates low likelihood of cognitive impairment.
- Score: 2 (0 for word recall, 2 for clock draw); warrants further cognitive evaluation.
- Score: 1 (1 for word recall, 0 for clock draw); indicates probable cognitive impairment. (Correct answer)
- Score: 0 (0 for word recall, 0 for clock draw); indicates definite cognitive impairment.
Correct answer: Score: 1 (1 for word recall, 0 for clock draw); indicates probable cognitive impairment.
The Mini-Cog™ is scored out of 5 points. The patient gets 1 point for each word recalled (0-3 points). The clock draw is scored as either normal (2 points) or abnormal (0 points). In this scenario, the patient recalled one word, earning 1 point. A normal clock must have the hands pointing to the correct numbers (11 and 2 for 10 past 11). Since the hands are incorrect, the clock draw score is 0. The total score is 1 + 0 = 1. A score of less than 3 is considered a positive screen and indicates the need for a more thorough cognitive assessment.
Question 4: Which of the following validated screening tools is specifically designed to identify both potentially inappropriate medications to STOP and potential prescribing omissions to START in older adults?
- Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)
- Beers Criteria®
- STOPP/START Criteria (Correct answer)
- Drug Burden Index (DBI)
Correct answer: STOPP/START Criteria
The STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment) criteria are designed as a complementary pair. STOPP criteria identify potentially inappropriate medications that should be considered for discontinuation, while START criteria identify common prescribing omissions where a medication may be indicated but is not prescribed. The Beers Criteria® primarily focus on medications to avoid (potentially inappropriate) in older adults but do not explicitly address prescribing omissions. The MAI and DBI are other tools used to assess medication appropriateness and burden, respectively, but the STOPP/START tool is unique in its dual focus on both inappropriate prescriptions and omissions.
Question 5: A consultant pharmacist is reviewing a frail, 88-year-old resident with a limited life expectancy. The resident is on multiple preventive medications, including a statin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Which specialized screening tool would be most appropriate for guiding deprescribing in this specific patient context?
- The Fried Frailty Phenotype
- The Beers Criteria®
- The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)
- The STOPPFrail tool (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The STOPPFrail tool
The STOPPFrail tool is specifically designed to guide deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medicines for frail older adults (≥65 years) with a limited life expectancy. It provides a structured framework for considering the withdrawal of medications where the potential for harm may outweigh the potential for benefit in this patient population. While the Beers Criteria identify high-risk drugs, STOPPFrail is more tailored to the context of frailty and end-of-life care. The Fried Frailty Phenotype is an assessment tool to diagnose frailty, not to guide medication changes. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is used to screen for malnutrition.
Question 6: During a nutritional assessment of a 79-year-old skilled nursing facility resident, which of the following tools is considered a well-validated, widely used screening instrument specifically developed to identify malnutrition or risk of malnutrition in the geriatric population?
- Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)
- Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) (Correct answer)
- Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
- Body Mass Index (BMI) calculation alone
Correct answer: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)
The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a frequently used and widely validated tool specifically designed to identify malnutrition and nutritional risk in individuals aged 65 and older. It is recommended by numerous organizations for use in the geriatric population. While other tools like the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) exist, the MNA was developed specifically for older adults. A BMI calculation is a component of nutritional assessment but is not a comprehensive screening tool on its own. The Geriatric Depression Scale assesses mood, not nutrition.
An 84-year-old male resident of an assisted living facility reports two falls in the past three months.
The consultant pharmacist performs a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test to assess his mobility and fall risk.
The resident, using his standard walker, completes the test in 18 seconds.
Based on this result, what is the most appropriate interpretation and action?