A FRACGP candidate is found to have submitted a case report that closely mirrors a published case study without attribution. How is this likely to be handled in the evaluation process?
-
A
The candidate receives a written warning but the case report is still graded normally
-
B
The matter is referred to the RACGP's academic integrity process and may result in disqualification
-
C
The supervisor is held responsible and the candidate is given an opportunity to resubmit
-
D
The case report is automatically failed but other components are unaffected