I applied for a supply chain analyst role at Procter & Gamble and just got the email to complete the online assessment. I've done hiring assessments before but I've heard the P&G one is specifically designed to filter heavily, not just screen. I want to walk in knowing what I'm actually being evaluated on.
From what I've pieced together from forums and friends who've gone through it, the assessment has a numerical reasoning section, a verbal reasoning section, and a situational judgment component. The numerical section involves reading charts and data tables under a tight time limit — something like 20 questions in 25 minutes. I'm decent at data interpretation but I'm not fast under pressure, which worries me.
The situational judgment section is the one I'm most uncertain about. From what I understand, P&G has specific values it's testing for — things like taking initiative, long-term thinking, and collaborative problem-solving — and the best answers are graded against their internal model rather than any universal framework. Gaming it isn't really possible but being aware of the cultural fit they're looking for probably helps.
I've got about 10 days before the deadline. I'm planning to run 3–4 numerical reasoning practice sessions and read through P&G's published values and leadership competencies before taking the actual assessment. Is there anything specific that's changed about the format recently that I should know about?
The numerical section is the primary filter in my experience. I know three people who made it through the SJT but got cut on numerical. Time management is the issue — the questions aren't hard, there's just not enough time to be slow. Practice under strict timing.
10 days is enough. Don't overthink the SJT — if you're genuinely collaborative and initiative-oriented, your instincts will align. I spent most of my prep on numerical and it made the biggest difference in my outcome.
For the SJT, P&G's published values aren't just marketing fluff — the assessment really does align to their leadership success profiles. Reading through them carefully gave me a strong frame for the which-response-is-most-effective questions.
The format changed slightly in late 2025 — there's now a short cognitive reasoning section before the numerical that some people weren't expecting. It's pattern-based, about 10 minutes. Not hard but it threw off classmates who weren't mentally prepared for it.
Just finished my second practice run on the numerical reasoning section and scored a 71%, which feels okay but I've heard P&G wants you north of 75 to feel safe. The verbal and situational judgement parts weren't as brutal as I expected, honestly. It's the numerical where they seem to really thin the herd.
I'm planning to sit the real thing this Friday so I've got a few days to drill weak spots. If you're still prepping, don't sleep on the time pressure — that's what caught me off guard the first practice round, not the difficulty of the questions themselves.
Just passed mine last week for a similar ops role, so I can actually answer this. The numerical reasoning section is where they cut the most people — it's not just basic math, it's timed problem sets where the data is intentionally messy and you have to stay calm. I'd been using free pg numerical reasoning practice sets the week before and honestly that's the one thing that made me faster under pressure.
The situational judgment part matters too but it's more about showing you know how to work in a team without being difficult. Don't overthink those. Focus your energy on the numerical section first because that's where I saw people in my grad program get filtered out before they even got to the interview stage.