Anyone found good free OK Bar study resources besides the obvious ones?

Same boat a few months ago. Here's what I'd tell myself:

The OK Bar exam is more application-focused than the study guides suggest. They test whether you understand OK Bar, not just whether you can define it.

My tip: when you see a scenario question, mentally walk through it step by step before looking at the answers. The wrong answers are designed to catch people who jump to conclusions.

Good luck — the fact that you're doing this level of prep means you're going to be fine.

Passed OK Bar 2 months ago. Happy to share what I remember.

On the "OK Bar exam" stuff specifically — I found the practice tests here were actually harder than the real exam on those questions. Which was great because going in I felt more prepared than I needed to be.

The time pressure is real though. I came in with maybe 8 minutes to spare and that was after skipping the ones I wasn't sure about and coming back.

Don't try to cram the night before. Seriously. Last-minute stress makes you second-guess things you actually know.

Same boat a few months ago. Here's what I'd tell myself:

The OK Bar exam is more application-focused than the study guides suggest. They test whether you understand OK Bar, not just whether you can define it.

My tip: when you see a scenario question, mentally walk through it step by step before looking at the answers. The wrong answers are designed to catch people who jump to conclusions.

Good luck — the fact that you're doing this level of prep means you're going to be fine.

Honestly the thing that made the biggest difference for me wasn't another resource, it was changing how I used the practice tests. I kept taking them and just moving on, feeling good when I got stuff right. Big mistake. What finally clicked was keeping a running doc of every single question I missed, and next to it I'd write WHY I missed it in plain English. Not the rule, the reason. Like "I assumed the answer hinged on the contract but it was actually a remedies issue." After a couple weeks I noticed the same dumb patterns showing up over and over, and once I saw them I stopped making them.

That's basically it. Sounds almost too simple but I passed and a buddy who crammed way harder than me didn't. He just grinded questions without ever looking back at his misses. So if you've already got solid free practice tests, you don't need ten more sources. You need to actually slow down and figure out where your brain keeps tripping. Do that and you'll get more out of the free stuff than most people get out of the paid courses.

The thing that actually moved the needle for me wasn't doing more practice tests, it was changing how I reviewed them. For every question I got wrong I'd force myself to write one sentence on why each wrong answer was wrong, not just why the right one was right. Sounds tedious. It is. But you start noticing the bar loves to bait you with answers that are true statements of law that just don't apply to the fact pattern, and once you can spot that you stop falling for it.

The ok bar torts and negligence set is where this clicked for me, because torts is all about distinctions like duty versus breach versus causation and the wrong options are usually testing whether you can tell those apart. I'd redo the same set a few days later and if I couldn't explain why the bad choices were traps, I clearly hadn't learned it yet. Memorizing the right answer just teaches you that question. Understanding the wrong ones teaches you the rule.