FANZCA written exam — how many sittings did it take most people?

by derek_v 27 views4 replies
D
derek_vOP
May 23, 2026

About to start serious prep for the FANZCA written exams and I'd love to hear realistic numbers from people who've been through it. How many hours a week were you studying, and how far out did you start? I've heard everything from 3 months of light review to 9 months of full-on intensive prep and I honestly can't tell what's typical versus exceptional.

I'm a registrar with about 2.5 years of anaesthetics experience, which I think puts me in a reasonable position content-wise, but the exam structure is unlike anything I've done before. The MCQ component with the true-false format is particularly unfamiliar. I'm told the negative marking changes how you have to approach uncertain questions, which adds a strategic layer on top of content knowledge.

Pass rates I've seen cited are around 55–60% per sitting, which is sobering. I'd genuinely rather take two full sittings and do well than rush the first one and deal with the psychological toll of a failure on top of training demands. But I also don't want to delay sitting if I'm already at a point where I could be ready.

Primarily curious about the pharmacology SAQs — is that where most people struggle? I find the physical principles section more straightforward to study but the pharmacology scope feels enormous.

P
priya_s
May 23, 2026

My study group all found the physiology integration questions harder than pure pharmacology. They'll give you a clinical scenario and you need to apply basic science across multiple systems simultaneously. Content knowledge alone isn't enough for those — that type of thinking takes dedicated practice.

S
sophie_m
May 24, 2026

The negative marking on the MCQs changes everything. I left about 8% of questions blank on my first sitting because I wasn't confident, and in hindsight some of those I could have reasoned through. By my second sitting I had a much better feel for when I was genuinely uncertain versus when anxiety was making me second-guess solid knowledge.

I
ingrid_p
May 24, 2026

I sat twice — failed the first sitting, got through the second about 8 months later. First attempt I started prep 4 months out doing about 10 hours a week. Second time I started 6 months out doing 15–18 hours a week and it made a real difference. The pharmacology scope is massive but the exam tests depth not just breadth.

C
chloe_g
May 25, 2026

Pharmacology SAQs were my weakest section too. The trick is that they're not just asking you to list drug classes — they want mechanism of action, clinical application, side effect profiles, and comparative pharmacology all tied together. Treating each agent as an isolated fact won't cut it.

Ready to practice?
Free FANZCA practice tests with detailed explanations and instant results.
FANZCA Practice Test

Join the Discussion

Sign in or register to reply with your account, or reply as a guest below.