CBE exam prep — 10 weeks out with econ background but weak on forecasting
I'm 10 weeks out from the CBE exam and trying to figure out where to focus. My background is in applied macroeconomics — 8 years in the field — so the economic theory and analysis domains feel solid. My weak areas are business communication, forecasting methods, and statistical modeling questions that go beyond what I use regularly at work. Averaging about 66% on practice questions right now.
Current routine is 90 minutes on weekdays. I'm using the NABE study guide as my primary resource and supplementing with a forecasting textbook I had from grad school. The CBE covers a broader range of applied business economics than I initially expected — it's not just academic theory, there's a lot of content on how economic analysis translates to business decisions and stakeholder communications.
The exam format is 3 hours with around 125 questions. From the NABE blueprint the domains are weighted but I can't find precise percentages for each. If anyone has a clearer sense of how heavily forecasting vs analysis domains are actually weighted in practice, that'd help me allocate the next few weeks. I don't want to spend 3 weeks on forecasting if it's only 10% of the exam.
I'm targeting 78%+ on practice tests before I'd feel ready. Is that a reasonable threshold or am I setting the bar too high?
The business communication questions caught me off guard — they're not just about economics, they're about how to present economic findings to non-economist stakeholders. If you've been in a role where you regularly brief executives or write reports, this section should come naturally. If not, it's worth specific prep.
78% target is reasonable. I passed with consistent 76-79% practice scores and the real exam felt comparable to my better practice sessions. The domain weighting isn't published precisely but from my experience the analysis and data interpretation sections are the heaviest.
The forecasting questions I saw were more applied than theoretical — given these data characteristics, which method is appropriate, rather than deriving the math. If you understand when to use different approaches and their limitations you'll handle those fine.
With 8 years in the field you're probably better positioned than your 66% suggests. Early practice scores often underperform because the question framing is unfamiliar. Give it another 2-3 weeks and see where your scores land before adjusting your plan.