FE-1 Contract Law 2

Question 1

What is the test for remoteness of damage in contract law following Hadley v Baxendale (1854)?

Accepted Answer

Damages are recoverable only for losses that arise naturally from the breach or that were within the reasonable contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting as probable consequences

Answer

The two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale: damages for losses arising naturally from the breach in the ordinary course of things; and damages for special losses within the reasonable contemplation of both parties at contract formation time.

Question 2

What is the doctrine of frustration in Irish contract law?

Accepted Answer

A contract is frustrated when, after formation, an event occurs without the fault of either party that renders performance radically different from what was undertaken — the contract is automatically discharged

Answer

Frustration (following Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC and the Irish Fibreboard case) requires a supervening event, not caused by either party, that makes performance fundamentally different in nature from what was agreed. Increased expense alone is insufficient.

Question 3

Under Irish contract law, what is the distinction between a condition and a warranty?

Accepted Answer

A condition is a term that goes to the root of the contract — breach entitles the innocent party to terminate and claim damages. A warranty is a less important term — breach gives a right to damages only

Answer

The classification determines remedies: breach of condition entitles the innocent party to treat the contract as repudiated (terminated) and claim damages. Breach of warranty sounds in damages only — the innocent party must continue performance.

Question 4

What is the rule in Pinnel's Case (1602) and how does it relate to part payment of debt in Irish law?

Accepted Answer

Payment of a lesser sum cannot be satisfaction for the whole debt — part payment of an existing debt is not good consideration for a promise to forgo the balance, though estoppel may intervene

Answer

Pinnel's Case (confirmed in Foakes v Beer) holds that a creditor's promise to accept less than is owed is unenforceable for lack of consideration. However, promissory estoppel (High Trees) may prevent the creditor from suing for the balance if the debtor relied on the promise.

Question 5

What are the requirements for the remedy of specific performance in Irish equity?

Accepted Answer

The contract must be for something unique (e.g. land), damages must be inadequate, the contract must be certain, the plaintiff must have acted equitably (clean hands), and the remedy must be fair

Answer

Specific performance is a discretionary equitable remedy ordered where damages would be inadequate, typically for unique property (land), where the contract is sufficiently certain, the plaintiff has clean hands, and the court considers it just to grant the remedy.

FE-1 Practice Test

FE-1 Practice Test

FE-1 Contract Law 2