Use of Force Principles Flashcards

According to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Graham v. Connor, the standard for analyzing excessive force claims is 'objective reasonableness.' Which of the following best describes this standard?

Answer: Whether the officer's actions are 'objectively reasonable' in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent.

The Supreme Court in Graham v. Connor established that excessive force claims must be judged by an 'objective reasonableness' standard under the Fourth Amendment. This means the court considers whether a reasonable officer on the scene would have acted similarly, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at that moment, not their personal intent or information that only became available later.

An officer is pursuing a suspect who has just committed a non-violent felony burglary. The suspect is unarmed and fleeing on foot in an open field, posing no immediate threat to the officer or the public. Under Tennessee v. Garner, when would the officer be justified in using deadly force?

Answer: Only if the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

The Supreme Court ruling in Tennessee v. Garner held that the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing felon is unconstitutional unless the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. In this scenario, the suspect is unarmed, non-violent, and not an immediate threat, so deadly force would not be justified.

Which of the following is NOT a primary factor an officer should consider when determining the reasonableness of a use of force, as established in Graham v. Connor?

Answer: The suspect's prior criminal history.

Graham v. Connor outlined three key factors for determining objective reasonableness: the severity of the crime, the immediate threat posed by the suspect, and whether the suspect is actively resisting or fleeing. While an officer might be aware of a suspect's history, it is not one of the primary, objective factors established by the Supreme Court for judging the reasonableness of force in the moment.

An officer responds to a call and encounters an individual who is verbally non-compliant but is making no threatening gestures or movements. According to the use of force continuum concept often used in Florida law enforcement training, what would be the most appropriate initial level of officer response?

Answer: Officer presence and verbal commands.

The use of force continuum is a model that provides a framework for officer responses based on a subject's level of resistance. For a subject who is present and verbally resistant, the appropriate initial response is typically officer presence and verbal commands to de-escalate the situation before resorting to physical force.

Under Florida Statute 776.05, a law enforcement officer is justified in the use of any force which he or she reasonably believes to be necessary for what purpose?

Answer: To defend himself or another from bodily harm while making the arrest.

Florida Statute 776.05 states that an officer is justified in using force that they reasonably believe is necessary to defend themselves or another person from bodily harm while making a lawful arrest. The statute also covers force used in retaking an escaped felon or arresting a fleeing felon.

An officer attempts to arrest a suspect for a forcible felony. The suspect actively and violently resists, attempting to take the officer's firearm. The struggle moves near a busy intersection. The officer reasonably believes their life and the lives of nearby civilians are in imminent danger. In this scenario, the use of deadly force would likely be considered:

Answer: Justified, due to the suspect's actions creating a threat of death or great bodily harm.

This scenario meets the standard for the justifiable use of deadly force. The suspect's violent resistance and attempt to gain control of the officer's firearm create a reasonable belief that the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to the officer and others. The officer's actions would be judged based on the 'objective reasonableness' standard from the perspective of a reasonable officer facing the same totality of circumstances.