Speaking and Listening Flashcards
7 cards from real ELA practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Speaking and Listening flashcards as text
In an academic discussion, a student says, 'Building on what Maria said…' before adding a new point. What does this signal?
Answer: The student is actively listening and connecting ideas collaboratively
Referencing a peer's contribution before adding a point demonstrates active listening and collaborative intellectual building.
Which best describes an 'anecdote' and its effect in a speech?
Answer: A brief personal story that makes an abstract point concrete and relatable
Anecdotes humanize abstract concepts by grounding them in real or realistic narrative experience.
What is the function of the 'conclusion' in a formal speech?
Answer: To restate the thesis, synthesize key points, and leave the audience with a memorable closing thought
A strong conclusion reinforces the central message and creates a lasting impression rather than simply stopping.
A listener hears a speaker make a logical leap from a single example to a sweeping generalization. This is an example of which logical fallacy?
Answer: Hasty generalization
A hasty generalization draws broad conclusions from insufficient or unrepresentative examples.
Which approach best helps a student stay on topic when responding during a class discussion?
Answer: Jotting a brief note of their point so they don't lose it while listening to others
Writing a brief note preserves the idea without interrupting listening, allowing for a focused and relevant response when called upon.
Which of the following is an example of nonverbal communication that supports a speaker's message?
Answer: Using deliberate hand gestures to emphasize key points
Purposeful gestures reinforce verbal content, enhance clarity, and maintain audience engagement.
What is the primary difference between 'evaluating' and 'critiquing' a speaker's argument in an academic context?
Answer: Evaluating assesses the quality of reasoning and evidence; critiquing identifies specific weaknesses and strengths in detail
Evaluation broadly assesses how well the argument works, while critique provides specific, detailed analysis of its components.