CSS CSS Sanctions Evasion Techniques & Red Flags 1

Question 1

Which technique involves a sanctioned party using multiple shell companies in non-sanctioned jurisdictions to disguise ultimate beneficial ownership?

Accepted Answer

Layering through corporate opacity

Answer

Layering through corporate opacity uses chains of shell companies across multiple jurisdictions to distance a sanctioned beneficial owner from the transaction or asset, making it difficult for compliance teams to identify the true party.

Question 2

What is 'AIS manipulation' (also known as 'AIS spoofing') and why is it a sanctions red flag?

Accepted Answer

Deliberately transmitting false location data or disabling a vessel's AIS transponder to conceal a vessel's true location or port calls

Answer

AIS spoofing involves transmitting false GPS coordinates or turning off AIS transponders to hide a vessel's true movements — particularly calls at sanctioned ports or ship-to-ship transfers of prohibited cargo.

Question 3

The use of cryptocurrency in sanctions evasion primarily creates compliance challenges because:

Accepted Answer

Crypto transactions can obscure the identity of parties, enabling sanctioned actors to move value while evading traditional financial screening

Answer

Cryptocurrency's pseudonymous nature and ability to transact across borders without traditional financial intermediaries create challenges for sanctions screening, though OFAC has asserted jurisdiction over virtual currency transactions.

Question 4

A 'loan-back' scheme in the context of sanctions evasion typically involves:

Accepted Answer

A sanctioned party depositing funds in a friendly bank and then borrowing against those funds to access clean money

Answer

In a loan-back scheme, a sanctioned party places blocked or illicitly obtained funds with a cooperative financial institution and then takes out a 'loan' collateralized by those funds, receiving seemingly legitimate funds while maintaining access to the underlying value.

Question 5

Which jurisdictional characteristic makes certain offshore financial centers (OFCs) particularly high-risk from a sanctions evasion perspective?

Accepted Answer

Limited beneficial ownership disclosure requirements, making it difficult to identify the true owners of entities registered there

Answer

OFCs with weak beneficial ownership transparency allow sanctioned parties to register companies and hold assets anonymously, exploiting gaps between legal entity formation and disclosure of true ownership.

(CSS) Certified Sanctions Specialist Practice Test

(CSS) Certified Sanctions Specialist Practice Test

CSS CSS Sanctions Evasion Techniques & Red Flags 1