← All CP Flashcard Decks

Criminal Law & Procedure Flashcards

7 cards from real CP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Criminal Law & Procedure flashcards as text
  1. Under California law, what is the primary distinction between first-degree and second-degree murder?

    Answer: Premeditation and deliberation

    First-degree murder requires willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, while second-degree murder is any other intentional killing.

  2. The exclusionary rule established in Mapp v. Ohio applies to evidence obtained through:

    Answer: Unconstitutional searches and seizures

    Mapp v. Ohio extended the exclusionary rule to state courts, prohibiting use of evidence obtained through Fourth Amendment violations.

  3. In California, a 'wobbler' offense is one that can be charged as:

    Answer: A felony or misdemeanor depending on circumstances

    A wobbler is an offense that the prosecutor may charge as either a felony or misdemeanor based on facts and the defendant's history.

  4. What is the purpose of a preliminary hearing in California criminal proceedings?

    Answer: To determine if probable cause exists to hold the defendant for trial

    A preliminary hearing is a probable cause determination where a judge decides whether sufficient evidence exists to require the defendant to stand trial.

  5. Under Miranda v. Arizona, warnings must be given when a suspect is:

    Answer: In custody and subject to interrogation

    Miranda warnings are required when two conditions are met: the suspect is in custody AND subject to interrogation.

  6. California Penal Code Section 187 defines murder as the unlawful killing of a human being with:

    Answer: Malice aforethought

    California defines murder as the unlawful killing of a human being or fetus with malice aforethought under PC 187.

  7. The 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine extends the exclusionary rule to:

    Answer: Evidence derived from an initial constitutional violation

    The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine excludes not only directly obtained illegal evidence but also secondary evidence derived from the initial violation.