Peer Benchmarking & Valuation Flashcards
7 cards from real CIRO practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Peer Benchmarking & Valuation flashcards as text
Which of the following best describes the 'football field' valuation chart used in IR presentations?
Answer: A visual displaying valuation ranges from multiple methodologies side by side
A 'football field' chart presents valuation ranges from DCF, comparable companies, and precedent transactions on a single horizontal bar chart.
A company's EV/EBITDA multiple expanded from 8x to 12x over two years while EBITDA grew 10%. What is the primary driver of stock price appreciation?
Answer: Multiple expansion
When the multiple expands from 8x to 12x (50% increase) versus 10% EBITDA growth, multiple re-rating is the dominant driver of value creation.
Precedent transaction multiples are typically higher than public company trading multiples because they include:
Answer: A control and synergy premium
Acquirers pay a control premium and expect to capture synergies, inflating transaction multiples above standalone trading levels.
Which valuation method is most appropriate for a capital-intensive company with stable, predictable free cash flows?
Answer: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
DCF analysis is ideal for stable, cash-generative businesses where long-term cash flows can be reliably projected.
An IR officer notices the company's Price-to-Book ratio is 0.8x versus peers at 1.5x. What is the most likely investor concern?
Answer: The company's assets are overvalued or returns on equity are insufficient
A P/B below 1.0x suggests the market values the company below its net assets, often indicating concerns about asset quality or inadequate return on equity.
In benchmarking, 'normalizing' earnings means:
Answer: Adjusting financials to remove one-time or non-recurring items for a cleaner comparison
Normalizing removes non-recurring charges or gains so that ongoing earnings power is comparable across the peer group.
What is the primary risk of using a peer group that is too large and diverse?
Answer: Median multiples become meaningless because the peers are not truly comparable
An overly broad peer group dilutes comparability; the resulting median valuation metric may not reflect any single company's true comparable universe.