CIP Program Development & Evaluation 2

Question 1

Which evaluation approach focuses on measuring whether an interpretive program achieved its stated objectives?

Accepted Answer

Summative evaluation

Answer

Summative evaluation assesses outcomes and determines whether a program met its intended objectives after completion.

Question 2

A heritage site interpreter wants to know if visitors feel emotionally connected to a historical event after a program. Which evaluation method is BEST suited?

Accepted Answer

Affective outcome measurement

Answer

Affective outcome measurement captures emotional responses and attitude changes, which are key interpretive goals.

Question 3

In Tilden's principles, what is the chief aim of interpretation?

Accepted Answer

To provoke thought and stimulate a desire to broaden understanding

Answer

Tilden stated that the chief aim of interpretation is not instruction but provocation — inspiring visitors to think and seek more.

Question 4

When developing an interpretive program for a multilingual audience, which strategy is most effective?

Accepted Answer

Use universal design principles and multilingual materials

Answer

Universal design combined with multilingual materials ensures all audience members can access and engage with the content.

Question 5

A national park interpretive team is planning a new program. They survey potential visitors before developing content. This is an example of:

Accepted Answer

Front-end evaluation

Answer

Front-end evaluation gathers audience information before program development to inform design decisions.

(CIP) Certified Interpretive Planner Practice Test

(CIP) Certified Interpretive Planner Practice Test

CIP Program Development & Evaluation 2