CILEx L3 Tort Law

Question 1

In Donoghue v Stevenson [1932], the House of Lords established which fundamental principle of tort law?

Accepted Answer

The neighbour principle forming the basis of the duty of care

Answer

Lord Atkin's 'neighbour principle' in Donoghue v Stevenson established that a person owes a duty of care to those who are so closely and directly affected by their acts that they ought reasonably to have them in contemplation. This case, involving a decomposed snail in a bottle of ginger beer, became the foundation of the modern law of negligence.

Question 2

What three-stage test for establishing a duty of care was set out in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990]?

Accepted Answer

Foreseeability, proximity, and fair just and reasonable to impose a duty

Answer

The Caparo test requires: (1) the damage must be reasonably foreseeable; (2) there must be sufficient proximity between the parties; and (3) it must be fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty. This three-stage test replaced the broader two-stage Anns test and remains the primary test for establishing novel duty of care situations in English law.

Question 3

What standard of care is applied to determine whether a defendant has breached their duty of care?

Accepted Answer

The standard of the reasonable person

Answer

The objective standard of the 'reasonable person' (formerly 'reasonable man') is used to assess breach. The court asks what a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have done. Relevant factors include the likelihood of harm (Bolton v Stone), the severity of potential injury (Paris v Stepney BC), the cost of precautions (Latimer v AEC), and the social utility of the activity (Watt v Hertfordshire CC).

Question 4

What is the 'but-for' test used to establish in negligence?

Accepted Answer

Whether the defendant's breach caused the claimant's damage

Answer

The 'but-for' test establishes factual causation: but for the defendant's breach, would the claimant have suffered the damage? If the damage would have occurred regardless of the breach, causation is not established. This was applied in Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital [1969], where the patient would have died even with proper treatment.

Question 5

The defence of contributory negligence under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 has what effect?

Accepted Answer

It reduces the claimant's damages by a percentage reflecting their fault

Answer

Under the 1945 Act, where the claimant's own negligence has contributed to their damage, the court reduces the damages by the proportion it considers just and equitable having regard to the claimant's share of responsibility. For example, a claimant found 25% at fault would recover only 75% of their damages. Before the Act, contributory negligence was a complete defence.

CILEx Level 3 Practice Test

CILEx Level 3 Practice Test

CILEx L3 Tort Law