CILEx L3 Legal Skills & Research 3

Question 1

What is 'Hansard' and when can it be used as an aid to statutory interpretation?

Accepted Answer

Parliamentary debates; admissible as an aid to interpretation where the statutory provision is ambiguous or obscure and the ministerial statement clearly discloses the legislative intent (Pepper v Hart [1993])

Answer

Hansard records Parliamentary debates. Following Pepper v Hart [1993], courts may consult Hansard where: (1) the legislation is ambiguous or obscure, (2) the material relied on consists of clear statements made by the minister promoting the Bill, and (3) the effect of ignoring them would be an absurdity.

Question 2

What is the purpose of a 'practice note' or 'practice direction'?

Accepted Answer

Guidance issued by the courts on procedural matters to ensure consistent practice across cases

Answer

Practice notes and practice directions are official procedural guidance documents issued by the judiciary (often the Lord Chief Justice or the President of the court) to ensure that court procedures are applied consistently.

Question 3

What is an 'obiter dictum' and how does it differ from 'ratio decidendi' in terms of binding force?

Accepted Answer

Obiter dicta are persuasive but not binding; ratio decidendi is the binding legal reasoning of a case

Answer

The ratio decidendi is the binding part of a judgment — the legal principle on which the decision is based. Obiter dicta are things said 'by the way' that are not necessary for the decision. They may be persuasive, especially from senior courts, but are not binding.

Question 4

What is the process of 'distinguishing' a precedent?

Accepted Answer

A court finds that the material facts of the current case are sufficiently different from the earlier case to justify not following it

Answer

Distinguishing occurs when a court finds that the material facts of the case before it are sufficiently different from the earlier precedent that the ratio of that precedent does not apply. It allows courts to avoid inconvenient precedents without overruling them.

Question 5

What is the significance of 'Practice Statement [1966] 3 All ER 77' for the House of Lords?

Accepted Answer

The House of Lords declared it would no longer be bound by its own previous decisions where it considered it right to depart from them

Answer

The Practice Statement 1966 (now applying to the Supreme Court) allows the Supreme Court (formerly House of Lords) to depart from its own previous decisions where it appears right to do so, balancing certainty against the risk of injustice from past errors.

CILEx Level 3 Practice Test

CILEx Level 3 Practice Test

CILEx L3 Legal Skills & Research 3