Criminal Law Basics Flashcards
7 cards from real CHP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Criminal Law Basics flashcards as text
Under California Penal Code, what is the primary distinction between a felony and a misdemeanor?
Answer: The maximum potential sentence
A felony carries a potential sentence of more than one year in state prison, while a misdemeanor is punishable by up to one year in county jail.
Which legal standard must be met for a CHP officer to conduct a lawful arrest without a warrant?
Answer: Probable cause
Probable cause — a reasonable belief based on articulable facts that a crime has been committed — is required for a warrantless arrest.
California's 'corpus delicti' rule requires that before a confession can be used, the prosecution must show:
Answer: Independent evidence that the crime actually occurred
Corpus delicti requires independent proof that the crime occurred, preventing convictions based solely on uncorroborated confessions.
A CHP officer observes a driver commit a traffic violation and smells alcohol. Under Vehicle Code §23152, this gives grounds to investigate for:
Answer: Driving under the influence
VC §23152 prohibits driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and sensory observations (odor, erratic driving) establish grounds for a DUI investigation.
What does 'mens rea' mean in criminal law, and why is it significant for CHP officers?
Answer: The criminal intent or mental state required for guilt
Mens rea is the guilty mind or criminal intent; most crimes require both a wrongful act (actus reus) and the requisite mental state to establish criminal liability.
Under California law, assault is best defined as:
Answer: A willful attempt or threat to commit violent injury on another
California Penal Code §240 defines assault as an unlawful attempt, with present ability, to commit violent injury on another person — no actual contact is required.
The 'exclusionary rule' established in Mapp v. Ohio applies to state law enforcement officers and means:
Answer: Evidence obtained through unlawful search or seizure cannot be used at trial
The exclusionary rule bars illegally obtained evidence from being admitted in court, deterring Fourth Amendment violations by law enforcement.