The 'battle of the experts' phenomenon occurs when opposing experts reach contradictory conclusions. To maintain credibility in this situation, a fraud examiner should:
-
A
Aggressively attack the opposing expert's qualifications in testimony
-
B
Clearly articulate the methodological differences that explain the divergent conclusions
-
C
Request the court appoint a neutral third expert
-
D
Decline to comment on the opposing expert's opinion at all