CFE Conducting Investigations 3 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: In fraud investigations, the term 'chain of custody' refers to:
- The hierarchy of management involved in approving transactions
- The documented chronological record of evidence handling from collection to court (Correct answer)
- The sequence of financial approvals required for large purchases
- The organizational reporting structure of the investigation team
Correct answer: The documented chronological record of evidence handling from collection to court
Chain of custody documents every person who handled the evidence, ensuring its integrity and admissibility in legal proceedings.
Question 2: A fraud examiner conducting a cognitive interview would MOST likely ask the subject to:
- Answer only yes or no questions to prevent elaboration
- Recall events in reverse chronological order to stimulate memory (Correct answer)
- Sign a written statement before any verbal questioning
- Read from a prepared list of questions without deviation
Correct answer: Recall events in reverse chronological order to stimulate memory
The cognitive interview technique includes recalling events in different orders (including reverse) to enhance memory retrieval.
Question 3: Which of the following BEST describes a 'pretext' in the context of fraud investigations?
- A preliminary analysis conducted before the formal investigation begins
- Misrepresenting one's identity or purpose to gather information (Correct answer)
- A written summary of findings presented before the final report
- A legal privilege protecting investigative communications
Correct answer: Misrepresenting one's identity or purpose to gather information
A pretext involves using a false identity or pretense to obtain information, which raises significant legal and ethical concerns.
Question 4: When interviewing a subject who invokes their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in an internal investigation, the fraud examiner should:
- Cease all questioning immediately and close the investigation
- Continue questioning on unrelated topics while respecting the invocation
- Consult legal counsel and document the invocation (Correct answer)
- Threaten termination to compel the subject to answer
Correct answer: Consult legal counsel and document the invocation
Consulting legal counsel and documenting the invocation is the appropriate response to protect the investigation and the organization's legal position.
Question 5: A net worth analysis in a fraud investigation is primarily used to:
- Determine the replacement cost of stolen assets
- Identify unexplained increases in a subject's wealth beyond known income (Correct answer)
- Calculate the organization's financial loss from fraud
- Assess the market value of seized property
Correct answer: Identify unexplained increases in a subject's wealth beyond known income
Net worth analysis compares a subject's assets and liabilities over time to identify wealth increases that cannot be explained by legitimate income.
Question 6: Which of the following is an example of direct evidence in a fraud case?
- A witness testifying they personally saw the suspect alter a check (Correct answer)
- Bank records showing unusual transaction patterns
- An analysis proving that the suspect had opportunity to commit fraud
- Surveillance footage showing the suspect near the accounting department
Correct answer: A witness testifying they personally saw the suspect alter a check
Direct evidence proves a fact without requiring any inference, such as eyewitness testimony of the act itself.
Question 7: During a financial statement fraud investigation, an examiner identifies that revenue appears to be significantly overstated. The MOST appropriate analytical technique to use initially would be:
- Horizontal analysis comparing revenue trends over multiple periods (Correct answer)
- Vertical analysis of a single year's income statement
- Ratio analysis comparing accounts payable to total liabilities
- Cash flow analysis comparing beginning and ending balances
Correct answer: Horizontal analysis comparing revenue trends over multiple periods
Horizontal analysis across multiple periods reveals unusual trends or anomalies in revenue recognition that may indicate manipulation.
In fraud investigations, the term 'chain of custody' refers to: