โ† All CEA Flashcard Decks

Ethics Investigation Procedures Flashcards

7 cards from real CEA practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ€” missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Ethics Investigation Procedures flashcards as text
  1. An employee reports retaliation after filing an ethics complaint. How should the organization treat the retaliation allegation?

    Answer: Investigate it as a separate and equally serious matter

    Retaliation must be investigated independently because it constitutes a separate violation, regardless of the outcome of the underlying complaint.

  2. Which of the following best describes the concept of 'due process' in an internal ethics investigation?

    Answer: The accused must be given a fair opportunity to respond to allegations before conclusions are drawn

    Due process in internal investigations means giving the subject notice of allegations and an opportunity to respond, ensuring procedural fairness.

  3. When conducting a digital forensic review during an ethics investigation, which action is most important to take first?

    Answer: Create a forensic image or backup of the original data before analysis

    Preserving original data through forensic imaging ensures the integrity of evidence and prevents accusations of tampering or alteration.

  4. A witness refuses to cooperate with an internal ethics investigation. The organization's primary recourse is to:

    Answer: Document the refusal and note how it affects the investigation's completeness

    While cooperation can be required under employment policies, the investigator must document a refusal and assess its impact on the overall findings.

  5. Which standard of care requires ethics investigators to document their reasoning for every significant decision made during an investigation?

    Answer: The 'reasonable investigator' standard

    The reasonable investigator standard holds that decisions should be documented and defensible as those a competent, objective investigator would make.

  6. In a harassment investigation, why is it important to identify and interview corroborating witnesses even if the complainant did not name them?

    Answer: To gather independent evidence that can support or refute the accounts of the primary parties

    Corroborating witnesses provide independent perspectives that reduce reliance on a 'he said/she said' dynamic and strengthen the factual record.

  7. When an investigation involves potential criminal conduct, the internal ethics investigator should:

    Answer: Coordinate closely with legal counsel to avoid interfering with potential law enforcement inquiries

    Internal investigations must be coordinated with legal counsel when criminal conduct is suspected to avoid evidence contamination and protect legal privileges.