California POST Test Reading Comprehension Strategies 4 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: A passage describes an event in this order: investigation, arrest, crime, trial. What was the actual chronological order of events?
- Investigation, arrest, crime, trial
- Crime, investigation, arrest, trial (Correct answer)
- Arrest, crime, investigation, trial
- Trial, crime, arrest, investigation
Correct answer: Crime, investigation, arrest, trial
Logically, the crime occurs first, prompting an investigation, leading to arrest, then trial.
Question 2: When reading a statute, the phrase 'shall not' indicates:
- An optional prohibition
- A recommended guideline
- A mandatory prohibition — the action is forbidden (Correct answer)
- An action that may be taken with supervisor approval
Correct answer: A mandatory prohibition — the action is forbidden
'Shall not' is mandatory legal language indicating an absolute prohibition.
Question 3: A witness statement reads: 'I think the car was blue, or maybe green. It happened so fast.' What does this statement indicate about the witness's account?
- The car was definitely blue
- The witness is lying about the color
- The witness's observation of color is uncertain (Correct answer)
- Green is the more likely color
Correct answer: The witness's observation of color is uncertain
Phrases like 'I think' and 'or maybe' signal uncertainty, not deception or confirmed fact.
Question 4: The main idea of a passage is best found by:
- Reading only the last sentence
- Identifying the point that most other sentences support or develop (Correct answer)
- Counting which topic is mentioned most often
- Choosing the most dramatic statement in the text
Correct answer: Identifying the point that most other sentences support or develop
The main idea is the central claim or point that the majority of supporting details relate to.
Question 5: A regulation reads: 'Sergeant approval is required before an officer initiates undercover operations.' An officer begins an undercover operation after informing, but not receiving approval from, their sergeant. Has the officer complied?
- Yes, informing the sergeant fulfills the requirement
- No, informing is not the same as receiving approval (Correct answer)
- Yes, undercover operations are officer-discretion decisions
- No, but only if the operation fails
Correct answer: No, informing is not the same as receiving approval
The regulation specifically requires approval, not merely notification — these are distinct actions.
Question 6: Which of the following is an example of a fact rather than an opinion in a police report?
- The suspect appeared very dangerous
- The suspect seemed nervous during questioning
- The suspect was 6 feet tall with a scar on the left cheek (Correct answer)
- The suspect was probably involved in prior criminal activity
Correct answer: The suspect was 6 feet tall with a scar on the left cheek
Physical descriptors like height and visible features are objective, verifiable facts rather than judgments or interpretations.
Question 7: A passage argues: 'Community policing reduces crime by building trust.' A reader finds this claim lacks supporting data. What is the appropriate critical reading response?
- Accept the claim because it sounds reasonable
- Reject all policing strategies as ineffective
- Note the lack of evidence and withhold full acceptance of the claim (Correct answer)
- Assume the author has unstated evidence
Correct answer: Note the lack of evidence and withhold full acceptance of the claim
Critical readers require evidence before accepting claims, even when the claims seem plausible.
A passage describes an event in this order: investigation, arrest, crime, trial.
What was the actual chronological order of events?