Logical Transitions Flashcards
6 cards from real Bluebook SAT Test practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Logical Transitions flashcards as text
Read the following sentences and choose the transition that best completes the passage: 'Early astronomers believed the sun revolved around the Earth. ______, the mathematical models they developed to predict planetary motion were remarkably accurate, sometimes outperforming modern heliocentric approximations for short-range forecasts.' Which choice most precisely captures the logical relationship between the two sentences?
Answer: Paradoxically,
'Paradoxically' is correct because the passage presents a genuine contradiction: a fundamentally incorrect cosmological model produced accurate predictive results. This is a true paradox — not merely a contrast (which 'however' would signal) but a logical impossibility that turns out to be true. 'Consequently' and 'Therefore' both imply causation, which is wrong — the accuracy didn't result from the false belief. 'Similarly' implies equivalence, which misreads the relationship entirely.
A student is revising this passage: 'The committee reviewed every submitted proposal. [BLANK] the final budget allocated zero funding to infrastructure projects.' The student wants to signal that the outcome was surprising given what preceded it, but also that the outcome was the direct result of the review process. Which transition best accomplishes BOTH goals simultaneously?
Answer: Yet as a result,
'Yet as a result' uniquely accomplishes both goals: 'yet' signals surprise or unexpectedness, while 'as a result' signals direct causation. 'Counterintuitively' signals surprise but does NOT imply causation. 'Nevertheless' signals contrast but implies the outcome happened despite the review, not because of it — reversing the causal direction. 'In addition' signals continuation with no element of surprise or causation.
Which of the following sentences contains a transition that is grammatically correct but logically inappropriate for the relationship between the ideas? 'Marine biologists have documented a 40% decline in coral reef coverage over the past three decades.'
Answer: For instance, ocean temperatures have risen by an average of 1.2 degrees Celsius.
'For instance' signals that what follows is a specific example of what was just stated. However, rising ocean temperatures are a cause of coral decline — not an example of it. An example of a 40% decline would be something like 'the Great Barrier Reef has lost coverage in specific documented regions.' 'Accordingly' correctly implies the decline prompted action; 'By contrast' correctly compares two ecosystem types; 'In other words' correctly restates the statistic as a paraphrase.
Examine this argument structure: 'Sentence 1: Most classical composers died in poverty. Sentence 2: [BLANK] financial reward is not a reliable indicator of artistic merit.' A writer wants Sentence 2 to function as a conclusion that is logically supported by Sentence 1, while also implying this conclusion extends beyond composers to art generally. Which transition best achieves this?
Answer: More broadly, then,
'More broadly, then' accomplishes both logical tasks: 'then' marks the conclusion as following from the premise (like 'thus' or 'therefore'), while 'more broadly' explicitly signals that the conclusion generalizes beyond the specific case of composers. 'Thus' and 'As a result' mark a conclusion but offer no signal of generalization. 'Likewise' signals parallel structure or similarity — it would imply a comparison is being made, not a conclusion being drawn.
A passage reads: 'The new policy required all departments to submit quarterly reports. The finance department submitted reports monthly. ______ the human resources department submitted no reports at all.' Which transition most accurately reflects the logical relationship between the second and third sentences?
Answer: Meanwhile,
'Meanwhile' correctly signals that the two events (finance submitting monthly, HR submitting nothing) occurred during the same time period — the scope of the new policy. 'In contrast' is tempting, but contrast requires the two things to be compared against a shared standard. Here the finance department exceeded the standard while HR ignored it; they contrast with the policy, not primarily with each other. 'Similarly' is wrong because the behaviors are opposite. 'Subsequently' is wrong because there is no temporal sequence implied between the two departments' behaviors.
In formal academic writing, a student writes: 'Empirical studies consistently show that bilingual children outperform monolingual peers on executive function tasks. ______, researchers caution that these studies frequently suffer from selection bias, as families who raise bilingual children tend to have higher socioeconomic status.' The student wants a transition that acknowledges the preceding claim as genuinely established, while introducing a qualification that limits — but does not negate — its scope. Which transition is most precise?
Answer: That said,
'That said' is the most precise choice because it explicitly acknowledges the validity of the preceding claim before introducing a qualification — it means 'having granted that point.' 'However' signals contrast and is commonly used here, but it can imply the following sentence undermines or negates the first, which is too strong. 'On the contrary' directly contradicts the preceding claim, which is logically wrong — the researcher isn't saying bilingual benefits don't exist. 'Regardless' implies the qualification should be dismissed, inverting the intended logic.