← All Blockchain Technology Flashcard Decks

Risk Mitigation Flashcards

7 cards from real Blockchain Technology practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Risk Mitigation flashcards as text
  1. Which control most directly reduces the risk of a single compromised key draining a treasury wallet?

    Answer: Multi-signature (multisig) wallet requiring multiple approvers

    Multisig spreads signing authority so no single compromised key can move funds alone.

  2. A protocol wants to limit losses if an exploit is discovered after deployment. Which mechanism best mitigates this risk?

    Answer: A pausable/circuit-breaker function controlled by a guardian

    A circuit breaker lets defenders halt vulnerable functions before more funds are lost.

  3. What is the primary risk-mitigation purpose of a timelock on protocol governance actions?

    Answer: It gives users time to react or exit before a change takes effect

    A timelock delays execution, giving the community a window to detect and respond to malicious changes.

  4. Which practice best mitigates oracle manipulation risk in a DeFi lending protocol?

    Answer: Using a time-weighted average price (TWAP) from multiple sources

    TWAP across multiple liquid sources makes price manipulation far more expensive.

  5. A team holds an admin upgrade key. What mitigation reduces insider and single-point-of-failure risk for that key?

    Answer: Placing the key behind a multisig with a timelock

    A multisig plus timelock removes single-person control and delays any malicious upgrade.

  6. Which approach most effectively mitigates the risk of unknown vulnerabilities reaching production code?

    Answer: Independent third-party security audits plus a bug bounty program

    External audits and bug bounties surface flaws that internal teams often miss.

  7. What does setting per-transaction and daily withdrawal limits on a bridge primarily mitigate?

    Answer: The size of losses during an active exploit

    Rate limits cap how much can be drained before defenders intervene.